Thanks Henrik, David and Richard

I think it is using more than 3 (onsite) primary
tapes. I am going to review this further to make
sure.

regards

Richard Sims wrote:

> On May 9, 2006, at 7:17 AM, Timothy Hughes wrote:
>
> >  I have been testing the 5.3 reclaim stgpool command but
> > for some reason it seems reclaim more than 3 volumes. ...
>
> Tim -
>
> It would be healthy to have definitive information on the presumed
> problem. Please review what the operation actually did, from the
> Activity Log and evidence of the offsite copy storage pool volumes
> going to Pending state as a result. I'm wondering if what you are
> seeing is more than three Onsite volumes being mounted to satisfy the
> data movement of the contents of the offsite volumes. And take into
> account the circumstances when files span volumes. If you find hard
> evidence to contradict what the OFFSITERECLAIMlimit is supposed to
> do, by all means file a report with TSM Support.
>
>     Richard Sims