Re: Activity log filtering, ignorable messages, &c.
2006-04-26 13:31:45
>> On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 19:02:33 +0200, "Bos, Karel" <Karel.Bos AT atosorigin
>> DOT com> said:
> Why not filter out any ANR????I messages (ignore) and focus on the
> ANR????W warnings to filter down. I would almost always report the E and
> D messages.
Well, I hadn't been thinking of these messages as a-prioiri classes.
I began this as a list of individual messages I'd decided weren't all
that interesting w.r.t. the maintenance of the server; I didn't want
to ignore anything that I hadn't specifically considered, at least
momentarily. So that's a good thought.
But as I consider it, there are plenty of -E messages which need to
get filtered, or at least shunted to the client admin.
04/25/06 03:23:49 ANE4037E (Session: 309358, Node: POWERPC.CNS.UFL.EDU)
File '\\opers_sups\c$\Program Files\Tivoli\TSM\baclient\dsmsched.log' changed
during processing. File skipped.(SESSION: 30935)
though that's an ANE, not an ANR.
I haven't yet found a counterexample for the other side (i.e. a -I
message I think I want to see) ... Oh, here are a few:
04/25/06 12:35:55 ANR1440I All drives in use. Process 5558 being
preempted by higher priority operation. (SESSION: 660392)
04/25/06 15:50:31 ANR4553I Incremental database backup triggered; started
as process 2639. (PROCESS: 2639)
- Allen S. Rout
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: multiple tape processes for offsite volumes, Schaub, Steve |
Next by Date: |
Re: multiple tape processes for offsite volumes, Richard Sims |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: Activity log filtering, ignorable messages, &c., Paul Zarnowski |
Next by Thread: |
Re: Activity log filtering, ignorable messages, &c., Bos, Karel |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|