ADSM-L

Re: Netware 5.3.2.x client

2006-02-27 13:13:41
Subject: Re: Netware 5.3.2.x client
From: Timothy Hughes <Timothy.Hughes AT OIT.STATE.NJ DOT US>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:13:18 -0500
Thanks Patrick!

We one Novell client that uses 5.3.0
The NW OS is 6.5SP2

Another Novell client is at  5.3.03
NW OS5.1 SP7

Haven't notice a problem as of yet.

Patrick Boutilier wrote:

> Timothy Hughes wrote:
> > Is this just specific to 5.3.2.x? I am planning on upgrading
> > some Novell clients from 5.2.2 to 5.3.012 next week.
> >
> >
>
> I have seen the problem on both 5.3.0.0 and 5.3.012 as well. Problem is
> the server has to be rebooted for the problem to show up. And any
> changes you make for testing require a reboot which is why I setup a
> test server for the job. :-)
>
> >
> > TSM 5.3.2.1
> > TSM novell client 5.2.2
> > NW 6.5 SP2
>
> Not sure if the problem shows up in SP2 or not. Definitely on SP5.
>
> >
> >
> > Thanks in advance!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Patrick Boutilier wrote:
> >
> >> Richard Sims wrote:
> >>> I'm Netware-ignorant, but this sounds like an install problem: see if
> >>> you can review what transpired in the install, and check the Readme
> >>> file for any gotchas.
> >> Not an install problem since dsmcad loads fine from command prompt, just
> >> not autoexec.ncf
> >>
> >>> To employ a Unix analogy, it might work as a circumvention if it
> >>> could be started by doing a 'cd' to the client directory first, then
> >>> launch, which may allow it to find its resources...if that kind of
> >>> thing works in a Netware environment.
> >>>
> >> I believe the problem is that when dsmcad looks for the default dsm.opt
> >> file it is looking in the wrong place (
> >> \SYS:TIVOLI/TSM/CLIENT/BA/dsm.opt instead of
> >> <SERVERNAME>\SYS:TIVOLI/TSM/CLIENT/BA/dsm.opt )
> >>
> >> The 5.2.x client does not have this problem, just the 5.3.x client. I
> >> will open up a bug report with IBM since I can duplicate this at will.
> >> Just installed a basic Netware 6.5 server and applied sp5. This bug
> >> shows up right away which is why I am very surprised that nobody else
> >> has run across it.
> >>
> >>>    Richard Sims

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>