ADSM-L

Re: Group collocation

2005-10-15 19:03:42
Subject: Re: Group collocation
From: Fred Johanson <fred AT UCHICAGO DOT EDU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 18:03:23 -0500
I tried that, but I found I needed to change the collocation
group name in the script every 2-3 days.  For the time being,
it's easier to run the script manually before leaving every
afternoon.

---- Original message ----
>Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 12:23:58 -0400
>From: John Underdown <johnunderdown AT STI.SYNOVUS DOT COM>
>Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Group collocation
>To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>
>I'm scheduling the following scripts to automatically assign
new nodes to a copy group.
>
>Utilities available with TSM 5.3 server when dealing with
collocation groups.
>
>http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?
rs=100&q1=collocate+group&uid=swg21205433&loc=en_US&cs=utf-
8&lang=en
>
>john underdown
>junderdown AT sti.synovus DOT com
>
>>>> LISTSERV AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU 10/15/05 4:35 AM >>>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date:    Fri, 14 Oct 2005 08:42:21 -0500
>From:    fred johanson <fred AT UCHICAGO DOT EDU>
>Subject: Re: Group collocation
>
>I agree.  It's just another instance of eternal vigilance
forced on us by=20
>TSM.  I have a group adding a dozen or more new clients a
day.  If I don't=
>=20
>get them assigned to groups and they push so much to disk to
force a=20
>migration, I wind up with a dozen or so 3592 cartridges with
less than 1%=
> used.
>
>More important, until a fix is released, is that MIGDELAY be
set to 0 for=20
>any disk that goes to a group collocated tape.  Unhappy
things occur=20
>otherwise.  And I am still working with Level II whether
there are=20
>additional problems if you go from FILE to group collocated
tape.
>
>
>At 10:15 PM 10/13/2005 -0500, you wrote:
>>I know about this because I got bitten by it. I realize
it's working as=20
>>designed, but I think the design bites. Intuition tells me
that if you=20
>>collocate by group, any node not in a group doesn't get
collocated. But=20
>>that's not the way it is.
>>
>>--
>>Mark Stapleton (stapleton AT berbee DOT com)
>>IBM Certified Advanced Deployment Professional
>>  Tivoli Storage Management Solutions 2005
>>IBM Certified Advanced Technical Expert (CATE) AIX
>>Berbee Information Networks
>>Office 262.521.5627
>>
>>
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-
L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On
>> >Behalf Of Kolbeinn J=F3sepsson
>> >Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 9:22 PM
>> >To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>> >Subject: Re: Group collocation
>> >
>> >My apologizes, Mark you are correct!
>> >
>> >The best practise should be to use at least two seperate
>> >storagepools, the
>> >first with collocation=3Dno (where all non-collocated
nodes
>> >belongs to) and
>> >the second with collocation=3Dgroup (where nodes in
collocaton groups
>> >belongs), you can then chose if you use the second pool
also for
>> >collocation by node (non grouped nodes) or if you add the
>> >third stgpool
>> >with collocation=3Dnode (and perhaps the fourth stgpool
with
>> >collocation=3Dfilespace if your environment is "large
enough").
>> >
>> >Best regards,
>> >Kolbeinn
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >"Stapleton, Mark" <mark.stapleton AT BERBEE DOT COM>
>> >Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
>> >14.10.2005 01:39
>> >Please respond to
>> >"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
>> >
>> >
>> >To
>> >ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>> >cc
>> >
>> >Subject
>> >Re: Group collocation
>> >
>> >
>> >Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>
>> >>If I take a storage pool and change it to GROUP from NO
>> >>collocation, what
>> >>about the data for nodes that ARE NOT in collocation
groups ?
>> >>Does their
>> >>data get collocated or not ?  Will I all of a hsudden go
from
>> >1-2 daily
>> >>LTO2 mounts to 30 ?
>> >
>> >From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-
L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On
>> >Behalf Of Kolbeinn J=F3sepsson
>> >>Only data from nodes in collocationgroup will be
collocated, data from
>> >>other nodes in same stgpool will not be collocated.
>> >
>> >This is incorrect. My experience has been that, when
setting a pool to
>> >"collocation by group", that any node not belonging to a
>> >collocation group
>> >will get its data to that pool collocated.
>> >
>> >(from page 312 of the TSM 5.3 for Windows Administrators'
Reference)
>> >=3D=3D=3D=3D
>> >GRoup
>> >Specifies that collocation is enabled at the group level
for
>> >client nodes.
>> >The server attempts to put data for nodes that belong to
the same
>> >collocation group on as few volumes as possible. If the
nodes in the
>> >collocation group have multiple file spaces, the server
does
>> >not attempt
>> >to collocate those file spaces.
>> >
>> >If you specify COLLOCATE=3DGROUP but do not define any
groups, data is
>> >collocated by node. Similarly, if you specify
COLLOCATE=3DGROUP and you
>> >define a group but do not add nodes to the group, data is
>> >collocated by
>> >node.
>> >=3D=3D=3D
>> >
>> >The workaround I found is to create collocation groups and
>> >populate them,
>> >then create one more collocation group that contains all
other
>> >nodes that
>> >write to that storage pool that are *not* already in a
group.
>> >
>> >--
>> >Mark Stapleton (stapleton AT berbee DOT com)
>> >IBM Certified Advanced Deployment Professional
>> > Tivoli Storage Management Solutions 2005
>> >IBM Certified Advanced Technical Expert (CATE) AIX
>> >Berbee Information Networks
>> >Office 262.521.5627
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
>-----------------------------------------
>NOTICE: This communication is intended only for the person
or entity to
>whom it is addressed and may contain confidential,
proprietary, and/or
>privileged material. Unless you are the intended addressee,
any review,
>reliance, dissemination, distribution, copying or use
whatsoever of
>this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received
this in
>error, please reply immediately and delete the material from
all
>computers. Email sent through the Internet is not secure. Do
not use
>email to send us confidential information such as credit
card numbers,
>PIN numbers, passwords, Social Security Numbers, Account
numbers, or
>other important and confidential information.
>
Fred Johanson

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>