ADSM-L

Re: tsm tape path problems

2005-07-07 11:07:16
Subject: Re: tsm tape path problems
From: William Boyer <bjdboyer AT COMCAST DOT NET>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 11:07:21 -0400
If it wasn't "talking" to the library, then you would get errors. And audit 
compare TSM's LIBV inventory with the library inventory.
If the library inventory is up to date, then the library does not need to 
rescan the slots, but just returns the inventory to TSM.
Plus you would not be able to define the drives with the ELEMENT= if the 
library wasn't "talking" correctly. The ELEMENT= number is
verified with the library. To see what elements and such you can issue the SHOW 
SLOTS LB6.0.0.5 command. Another useful command is
SHOW LIBRARY LB6.0.0.5.

Have you tried to mount a tape and write to it? Or maybe even just a checkin?


Bill Boyer
"Some days you're the bug, some days you're the windshield" - ??

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of 
Alexander Lazarevich
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 10:49 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: tsm tape path problems

William, et all,

Thanks for your great responses, I think I'm closer to getting it working, but 
I still need a little more help.

I understand what you are saying about updating the paths, but the problem is I 
already removed the old paths and devices
(xxx.0.0.3), and created the new devices and paths (xxx.0.0.5). So I think 
doing an update path is out of the question. I'm stuck
trying to associate the new devices with the old server, which should be 
possible right?

So, I've removed all devices and paths, rebooted, then added all devices and 
paths (for the xxx.0.0.5 devices), rebooted again, and
now TSM seems to think the devies and paths are correct:

tsm: ITG-TSM>q library
       Library Name: LB6.0.0.5
       Library Type: SCSI
             ACS Id:
   Private Category:
   Scratch Category:
   External Manager:
     RSM Media Type:
             Shared: No
            LanFree:
ObeyMountRetention:

tsm: ITG-TSM>q drive
Library Name     Drive Name       Device Type     On-Line
------------     ------------     -----------     -------------------
LB6.0.0.5        MT1.0.0.5        LTO             Yes
LB6.0.0.5        MT2.0.0.5        LTO             Yes

tsm: ITG-TSM>q path
Source Name     Source Type     Destination     Destination     On-Line
                                 Name            Type
-----------     -----------     -----------     -----------     -------
ITG-TSM         SERVER          LB6.0.0.5       LIBRARY         Yes
ITG-TSM         SERVER          MT1.0.0.5       DRIVE           Yes
ITG-TSM         SERVER          MT2.0.0.5       DRIVE           Yes

But something is still not right, because when I run an audit of the "new"
library, the process completes, but it does nothing to the library, the library 
doesn't move in inch, it is not talking to the
library correctly:

ANR2017I Administrator DUDE issued command: AUDIT LIBRARY lb6.0.0.5 
checklabel=yes ANR0984I Process 5 for AUDIT LIBRARY started in
the BACKGROUND at 09:41:03.
ANR8457I AUDIT LIBRARY: Operation for library LB6.0.0.5 started as process 5.
ANR8461I AUDIT LIBRARY process for library LB6.0.0.5 completed successfully.
ANR0985I Process 5 for AUDIT LIBRARY running in the BACKGROUND completed with 
completion state SUCCESS at 09:41:03.

I'm wondering if my device class is not correct in some way?:

tsm: ITG-TSM>q dev

Device       Device        Storage    Device       Format     Est/MaxMount
Class        Access           Pool    Type                   CapacityLimit
Name         Strategy        Count                               (MB)
---------    ----------    -------    ---------    ------    --------------
DISK         Random              3
LTOCLASS1    Sequential          1    LTO          DRIVE            DRIVES


Any other ideas?

Thanks!

Alex



On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, William Boyer wrote:

> One thing I have found with Windows is after any type of hardware
> change, whether it is a replacement or just firmware updates, Windows
> seems to not recognize it as the same device, and creates new ones for
> this same (upgraded) hardware. If you just give the TSM server a few minutes 
> to time out on trying to initialize the library, then
you can update the library path to the new device= and then update the drive 
paths to the new device=.
>
> I've started stopping TSM, removing the library/drives from Device
> manager in Windows, doing the upgrade/replace and rebooting. I've found that 
> Windows assigns the same devices. Then I just restart
TSM and verify that all is well.
>
> I don't know if persistent mappings with the fibre adapter (if you are 
> running fibre drives) would resolve this issue...
>
>
> Bill Boyer
> "Some days you're the bug, some days you're the windshield" - ??
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf
> Of Alexander Lazarevich
> Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 11:21 PM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: tsm tape path problems
>
> TSM 5.1.9.0 on win2K server. Overland Neo 4100 with 2 LTO-2 drives.
>
> I've got a bad problem, and I'm stuck trying to read the manual for
> clues but I'm having trouble finding what I need to know and I could really 
> use a point in the right direction.
>
> TSM has been running just fine since I set it up more than two years ago.
> I used the TSM wizard to set everything up, and it was quite easy.
> Last week we had an LTO-2 drive failure, some bad cables, and an intermittent 
> library controller card. All those hardware issues
have been fixed.
>
> But somewhere in the mess of fixing all the hardware issues, the TSM
> /windows drivers for the devices got confused, and TSM is now
> recognizing the library and the drives as different device names.
> Whereas TSM used to call the devices: lb6.0.0.3 (library),
> mt1.0.0.3 (drive 1), and mt2.0.0.3 (drive 2); TSM is now calling those 
> devices lb6.0.0.5, mt1.0.0.5, and mt2.0.0.5.
>
> I've tried everything I know of to fix the path between the server and the 
> "old" devices (lb6.0.0.3), but nothing I tried worked.
> So, I then set out to try and define new path's for the "new" devices 
> (lb6.0.0.5). I've done the following:
>
> - Define the new library and drives, giving them the proper names
>   and element ID's.
> - Update the server's LTO Device Class, giving it the new library name
>   lb6.0.0.5.
> - Add the new path's for the drives and the library:
> tsm: ITG-TSM>q path
>
> Source Name     Source Type     Destination     Destination     On-Line
>                                 Name            Type
> -----------     -----------     -----------     -----------     -------
> ITG-TSM         SERVER          LB6.0.0.5       LIBRARY         Yes
> ITG-TSM         SERVER          MT1.0.0.5       DRIVE           Yes
> ITG-TSM         SERVER          MT2.0.0.5       DRIVE           Yes
>
> But then I try to run an audit of the new library, and I get nothing:
>
> ANR2017I Administrator ALAZAREV issued command: AUDIT LIBRARY
> lb6.0.0.5 ANR0984I Process 5 for AUDIT LIBRARY started in the BACKGROUND at 
> 21:42:02.
> ANR8457I AUDIT LIBRARY: Operation for library LB6.0.0.5 started as process 5.
> ANR8461I AUDIT LIBRARY process for library LB6.0.0.5 completed successfully.
> ANR0985I Process 5 for AUDIT LIBRARY running in the BACKGROUND completed with 
> completion state SUCCESS at 21:42:02.
>
> The audit did nothing, as it starts and completes within a second. The 
> library didn't move an inch.
>
> Obviously, I'm not setting up the paths properly, or the devices
> classes, or something. What I find odd is that when I run the Device
> Configuration Wizard, TSM does not find any devices. That is different from 
> when I first installed TSM, when it found all devices
automatically for me.
>
> I'm going to read Chapter 4 of the admin guide tonight when I go home,
> but I've already looked at it, and I can't find the information I need
> described in a clear manner. Any help anyone could provide, even just 
> pointing me to some good documentation, I would appreciate
it.
>
> Sorry to be a pest, but I'm in trouble, as our backups are down and I need a 
> little help getting it back up.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Alex
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>