ADSM-L

Re: Re TSM 5.1 - 5.2 and Solaris 9

2005-06-10 11:34:17
Subject: Re: Re TSM 5.1 - 5.2 and Solaris 9
From: "Stapleton, Mark" <mark.stapleton AT BERBEE DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 10:33:42 -0500
Read the README docs that accompany the installation code for 5.1.

--
Mark Stapleton (stapleton AT berbee DOT com)
IBM Certified Advanced Deployment Professional
  Tivoli Storage Management Solutions 2005
IBM Certified Advanced Technical Expert (CATE) AIX
Office 262.521.5627

 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On 
>Behalf Of Farren Minns
>Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 10:23 AM
>To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>Subject: Re TSM 5.1 - 5.2 and Solaris 9
>
>Hi all TSMers
>
>I am hoping to be getting a new Sun Fire V240 to replace our 
>current E250
>TSM backup server. At present our E250 still have Solaris 2.7 
>as the OS and
>I need to move top at least 2.8 in order to upgrade to TSM 5.2.
>
>What I am hoping to do providing the new server is fourth 
>coming (and that
>is not yet guaranteed), is install Solaris 2.9 and then 
>recreate the same
>TSM environment as on the existing E250 ( so initially running 
>TSM 5.1.6.2
>under Solaris 2.9). I will then proceed with the upgrade of 
>TSM 5.1 to 5.2.
>So my question is this. Does anyone have any experience on 
>running TSM 5.1
>on Solaris 2.9 and is it a supported mix?
>
>Many thanks in advance
>
>Farren Minns
>Solaris System Admin / Oracle DBA
>IT - Hosting Services
>
>
>######################################################################
>The information contained in this e-mail and any subsequent
>correspondence is private and confidential and intended solely
>for the named recipient(s).  If you are not a named recipient,
>you must not copy, distribute, or disseminate the information,
>open any attachment, or take any action in reliance on it.  If you
>have received the e-mail in error, please notify the sender and delete
>the e-mail.
>
>Any views or opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the
>individual sender, unless otherwise stated.  Although this e-mail has
>been scanned for viruses you should rely on your own virus check, as
>the sender accepts no liability for any damage arising out of any bug
>or virus infection.
>######################################################################
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: Re TSM 5.1 - 5.2 and Solaris 9, Stapleton, Mark <=