ADSM-L

Re: Getting TSM to show the l1 or l2 suffix on tape names

2005-01-17 10:15:39
Subject: Re: Getting TSM to show the l1 or l2 suffix on tape names
From: Bill Boyer <bjdboyer AT COMCAST DOT NET>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 10:15:20 -0500
Just remember if you change this you will have to re-label all your TSM
tapes. This setting effects the barcode reported to TSM...and that's what
TSM uses to label the tapes. If you change this setting any/all existing TSM
tapes will be unavailable to you unless you change your checkin to
CHECKL=YES. This will cause TSM to ignore the barcode and read the internal
label.

Bill Boyer
"Some days you are the bug, some days you are the windshield." - ??


-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]On Behalf Of
Stapleton, Mark
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 2:58 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: Getting TSM to show the l1 or l2 suffix on tape names


>Iain.Barnetson AT HALLIBURTON DOT COM 01/13/2005 12:50:12 PM >>>
>>Can anyone advise me on how to get TSM to show the LTO
>>version, ie: l1 or l2 on the end of tape names.
>>I've seen it somewhere on the TSM website but can't find it
>>now :( Cheers

From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On
Behalf Of David Longo
>I seem to recall there is a setting on the LTO library itself
>as to whether it passes the suffix as part of the label name
>to external apps.

Assuming that this is an IBM 3583 library (please, please send details
when describing a problem):

There is a setting on the library front panel to set the tape volume
display mode to NORMAL (no L1 or L2 tags) or EXTENDED. I can't remember
where it is; you're best off digging up your manual and reading it.

--
Mark Stapleton (stapleton AT berbee DOT com)
Berbee Information Networks
Office 262.521.5627