Re: Optimizing Exchange backup/recover?
2004-09-09 14:25:33
Subject: |
Re: Optimizing Exchange backup/recover? |
From: |
Del Hoobler <hoobler AT US.IBM DOT COM> |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Sep 2004 14:25:29 -0400 |
Matt,
A few things to keep in mind:
* Exchange restore will almost always be slower than backup
because you are writing to disk and more importantly you are
replaying transaction logs.
* If you back up to tape and you run COLLOCATION by filespace,
it will keep the data for your separate storage group
on different tapes for the exact purpose of running
parallel restores.
Thanks,
Del
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Optimizing Exchange backup/recover?, MC Matt Cooper (2838)
- Re: Optimizing Exchange backup/recover?, Stapleton, Mark
- Re: Optimizing Exchange backup/recover?, Barnes, Kenny
- Re: Optimizing Exchange backup/recover?, MC Matt Cooper (2838)
- Re: Optimizing Exchange backup/recover?,
Del Hoobler <=
- Re: Optimizing Exchange backup/recover?, MC Matt Cooper (2838)
- Re: Optimizing Exchange backup/recover?, MC Matt Cooper (2838)
- Re: Optimizing Exchange backup/recover?, Hart, Charles
- Re: Optimizing Exchange backup/recover?, Jon Evans
- Re: Optimizing Exchange backup/recover?, Robert Clark
|
|
|