ADSM-L

Re: TDP Informix - copygroup retention values on Server?

2004-07-21 16:32:23
Subject: Re: TDP Informix - copygroup retention values on Server?
From: "Coats, Jack" <Jack.Coats AT BANKSTERLING DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:32:37 -0500
Reading the docs for the TDP closely helps.  I had to :(

In any case, you need to have one client for the machine (system and flat
files), and another name for the TDP. I hope this helps. ... Jack

-----Original Message-----
From: David McClelland [mailto:David.McClelland AT REUTERS DOT COM]
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 3:16 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: TDP Informix - copygroup retention values on Server?

Guys & especially Del Hoobler ;o),

New to Informix backups. One of our internal customers has an Informix
consultant in who has never used TSM before, and is looking to try out
some TDPI/ONBAR backups to our TSM servers. Looking at what (little)
documentation there is for TDPI on IBM.COM, I'm a little in the dark as
how to register these nodes best at the TSM server side.

I've created a new domain for these backups, but when it comes to
retver, reto etc in the backup and archive copygroups, I can't find any
guidance at all in the docs. From my understanding of I have been able
to discover, expiration is managed at the Informix end, so am I looking
at a similar setup to the retention settings I've used in the past for
DB2/Oracle backups?

Any guidance most welcome!

TSM Server Solaris 5.1.6.2, clients at 5.1.6.2 (Solaris probably 8 but
could be 9), don't know which version of TDP for Informix they might be
using, but I presume a latest version.

Rgds,

David McClelland
Reuters Ltd, London


--------------------------------------------------------------- -
        Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Get closer to the financial markets with Reuters Messaging - for more
information and to register, visit http://www.reuters.com/messaging

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.