ADSM-L

AW: *** Als Spam erkannt ***Re: Retiring LTO tapes

2004-03-11 11:46:35
Subject: AW: *** Als Spam erkannt ***Re: Retiring LTO tapes
From: Salak Juraj <j.salak AT ASAMER DOT AT>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 17:50:30 +0100
I find it ballsy, whuhh!

I think in restores, not backups.
Consequently, I mark tapes having 
write errors for the second time 
as destroyed and throw them away,
beeing afraid of them having read errors 
in case of later restore.
Juraj


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Coats, Jack [mailto:Jack.Coats AT BANKSTERLING DOT COM]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. März 2004 16:42
An: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Betreff: *** Als Spam erkannt ***Re: Retiring LTO tapes


I have not found a useful policy. If I start getting write errors on tapes
I make them a candidate for retirement, no matter how new or old they are.

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Comiskey [mailto:stephen.comiskey AT NOTES.ROYALSUN DOT COM]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 6:00 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Retiring LTO tapes


Hi,

I've a simple question for the group, we are using a mixture of IBM and
FujiFilm LTO1 tapes in a IBM3584 library.  Does anyone have a policy (or
your thoughts) on retiring tapes, i.e. after X number of read/writes or X
years service?

Looking forward to your responses

regards
Stephen Comiskey
Dublin, Ireland



__________________________________

Notice of Confidentiality

This transmission contains information that may be confidential and that may
also be privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient of the message (or
authorised to receive it for the intended recipient) you may not copy,
forward, or otherwise use it, or disclose it or its contents to anyone else.
If you have received this transmission in error please notify us immediately
and delete it from your system.

Email: internet.mail AT wgo.royalsun DOT com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • AW: *** Als Spam erkannt ***Re: Retiring LTO tapes, Salak Juraj <=