Re: 3494
2003-12-22 11:49:38
There were a couple reasoning...
1) Too 3590E's to manage @ 40/80GB for 700+ Clients 80% Intel Windows Based (@
180 Act/Del Retention - I know insane)
2) 3590E Drives are not capable of Fabricated loop with out a Bridge in between.
3) Still had depreciation on 3494 Libraries.
We make daily offsite copies, which is our saving grace if onsite tape goes
bad. So far we have moved approx 60TB of backup data using 2x3590 to 2x3592
Drives and only had one issues with a tape sticking in the 3590 Drive. The
3592's for the past 2weeks have been rock solid so far...
We are starting to swap out more 3590 to 92's tomorrow on a different backup
server...
Happy Holidays!
-----Original Message-----
From: Joni Moyer [mailto:joni.moyer AT HIGHMARK DOT COM]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 9:38 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: 3494
Not to get off of the subject, but what made you decide on the 3592 tape
configuration? My thoughts are, what if you lose 1 tape with 1TB of data
on it and it didn't make the offsite copy yet? Also, have you had many
problems with the 3592's? Thanks!
********************************
Joni Moyer
Highmark
Storage Systems
Work:(717)302-6603
Fax:(717)302-5974
joni.moyer AT highmark DOT com
********************************
"Hart, Charles"
<charles.hart@MED
TRONIC.COM> To
Sent by: "ADSM: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Dist Stor cc
Manager"
<[email protected] Subject
.EDU> Re: 3494
12/22/2003 10:31
AM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor
Manager"
<[email protected]
.EDU>
Not sure of the price Diff, but we are in the midst of 3590 > 3592's and
the 3592's really rock. We are seeing 169GB an hour for our 3590 - 3592
Move data's(faster from 3592 to 3592) and our Unix Data is seeing tape
sizes from 900Gb toi 1 TB.
M00022 TAPE_APP_B- 3592TAPE 900,000.0
2.4 Filling
ACKUP
M00023 TAPE_APP_B- 3592TAPE 900,000.0
3.6 Filling
ACKUP
M00025 TAPE_DR_CO- 3592TAPE 900,000.0
2.5 Filling
PY
M00026 TAPE_DR_CO- 3592TAPE 1,232,573
99.7 Full
PY .7
M00027 TAPE_BACKU- 3592TAPE 1,075,622
98.5 Full
-----Original Message-----
From: Francois Chevallier [mailto:Francois.CHEVALLIER AT CCMX DOT FR]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 9:27 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: 3494
I have a 3494 with Magstar tapes 3590 and I would like to use a 3584 with
LTO tapes . What do you think about this choice (fiability,reliability..) .
Kind regards
François Chevallier
Parc Club du Moulin à Vent
33 av G Levy
69200 - Vénissieux
tél : 04 37 90 40 56
|
|
|