Re: 3494
2003-12-22 11:41:24
Not to get off of the subject, but what made you decide on the 3592 tape
configuration? My thoughts are, what if you lose 1 tape with 1TB of data
on it and it didn't make the offsite copy yet? Also, have you had many
problems with the 3592's? Thanks!
********************************
Joni Moyer
Highmark
Storage Systems
Work:(717)302-6603
Fax:(717)302-5974
joni.moyer AT highmark DOT com
********************************
"Hart, Charles"
<charles.hart@MED
TRONIC.COM> To
Sent by: "ADSM: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Dist Stor cc
Manager"
<[email protected] Subject
.EDU> Re: 3494
12/22/2003 10:31
AM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor
Manager"
<[email protected]
.EDU>
Not sure of the price Diff, but we are in the midst of 3590 > 3592's and
the 3592's really rock. We are seeing 169GB an hour for our 3590 - 3592
Move data's(faster from 3592 to 3592) and our Unix Data is seeing tape
sizes from 900Gb toi 1 TB.
M00022 TAPE_APP_B- 3592TAPE 900,000.0
2.4 Filling
ACKUP
M00023 TAPE_APP_B- 3592TAPE 900,000.0
3.6 Filling
ACKUP
M00025 TAPE_DR_CO- 3592TAPE 900,000.0
2.5 Filling
PY
M00026 TAPE_DR_CO- 3592TAPE 1,232,573
99.7 Full
PY .7
M00027 TAPE_BACKU- 3592TAPE 1,075,622
98.5 Full
-----Original Message-----
From: Francois Chevallier [mailto:Francois.CHEVALLIER AT CCMX DOT FR]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 9:27 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: 3494
I have a 3494 with Magstar tapes 3590 and I would like to use a 3584 with
LTO tapes . What do you think about this choice (fiability,reliability..) .
Kind regards
François Chevallier
Parc Club du Moulin à Vent
33 av G Levy
69200 - Vénissieux
tél : 04 37 90 40 56
|
|
|