Hmm, well this is odd. I check the GUI interface, and it says all files
belong to the "Default mgmtclass". That's no good. Because every one of
my management classes is labels as the default:
tsm: TSM>q mgmtclass
Policy Policy Mgmt Default Description
Domain Set Name Class Mgmt
Name Name Class ?
--------- --------- --------- --------- -----------------------
ITG-CLIE- ACTIVE ITG-CLIE- Yes ITG Client Mgmt Class
NT-POLI- NT-MGMT-
CY -CLASS
ITG-CLIE- ITG-CLIE- ITG-CLIE- Yes ITG Client Mgmt Class
NT-POLI- NT-POLI- NT-MGMT-
CY CY-SET -CLASS
ITG-POLI- ACTIVE ITG-POLI- Yes ITG Policy Management
CY CY-MANA- Class
GMENT-C-
LASS
ITG-POLI- ITG-POLI- ITG-POLI- Yes ITG Policy Management
CY CY-DOMA- CY-MANA- Class
IN GMENT-C-
LASS
ITG-SCRA- ACTIVE ITG-SCRA- Yes ITG Scratch Mgmt Class
TCH-POL- TCH-MGM-
ICY T-CLASS
ITG-SCRA- ITG-SCRA- ITG-SCRA- Yes ITG Scratch Mgmt Class
TCH-POL- TCH-POL- TCH-MGM-
ICY ICY-SET T-CLASS
ITG-STAF- ACTIVE ITG-STAF- Yes ITG Staff Mgmt Class
F-POLICY F-MGMT--
CLASS
ITG-STAF- ITG-STAF- ITG-STAF- Yes ITG Staff Mgmt Class
F-POLICY F-POLIC- F-MGMT--
Y-SET CLASS
Any idea what I'm doing wrong here?
Alex
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Alex Paschal wrote:
> You can go into the restore GUI, navigate to restore a file, and it'll
> definitively show you what mgmtclass your file is bound to. If it's still
> not rebinding, go into your command line client and do a "query inclexcl" to
> check to see if your TSM client is picking up the include statement.
>
> Alex
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexander Lazarevich [mailto:alazarev AT ITG.UIUC DOT EDU]
> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 8:43 AM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: different backup policy on single node?
>
>
> Well, the select statement returned nothing. Which is correct, because
> currently there is nothing in that management class, and if those OS X
> filespace didn't get moved to it (backup went by real fast, no volume
> rebounds), then a return of zippo is corrent.
>
> Do you think I need to delete the filespace first? And then back it up
> again?
>
> I'll keep trying.
>
> Thanks for the help though.
>
> Alex
>
|