Re: licensing (again... :( )
2003-10-09 13:14:44
From: Remco Post [mailto:r.post AT SARA DOT NL]
>since IBM now diffentiates it's TSM licensing fee based on the worksation of
server role a system has in the company, I assume that IBM has some
definition of what that it thinks a server or a workstation is.<
Is this true? The last I heard, licensing is by processor count, regardless of
the software installed. (100 processors' worth of license could allow for 100
installations of TSM server on 100 1-processor boxes, for instance.)
--
Mark Stapleton (stapleton AT berbee DOT com)
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- licensing (again... :( ), Remco Post
- Re: licensing (again... :( ),
Stapleton, Mark <=
- Re: licensing (again... :( ), Prather, Wanda
- Re: licensing (again... :( ), Coats, Jack
- Re: licensing (again... :( ), Murray, Jim
- Re: licensing (again... :( ), Prather, Wanda
- Re: licensing (again... :( ), Levinson, Donald A.
- Re: licensing (again... :( ), Thomas Denier
|
|
|