Re: Difference between results actlog and summary
2003-08-13 12:40:21
From: brian welsh [mailto:brianwelsh3 AT HOTMAIL DOT COM]
> The result of a back-up schedule looks like this in the actlog:
> 08/12/03 06:01:52 ANE4952I (Session: 10317, Node: ABC)
> Total number of
> objects inspected: 132,391
> 08/12/03 06:01:52 ANE4954I (Session: 10317, Node: ABCL)
> Total number of
> objects backed up: 1,666
>
> When I query the summary table I get the following results
> for the back-up
> activity:
> START_TIME: 2003-08-12 05:30:03.000000
> END_TIME: 2003-08-12 06:01:54.000000
> ACTIVITY: BACKUP
> NUMBER: 10317
> ENTITY: ABC
> COMMMETH: Tcp/Ip
> ADDRESS: xxx.xx.xxx.xx:42581
> SCHEDULE_NAME: xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> EXAMINED: 132
> AFFECTED: 1
> FAILED: 0
> BYTES: 3008563568
> IDLE: 1902
> MEDIAW: 0
> PROCESSES: 1
> SUCCESSFUL: YES
>
> Why shows the summary table examined 132 and the actlog
> 132,391 inspected?
> The same is happening for affected and backed up!
This list has discussed this issue *repeatedly* over the last year or
so. Please consult the archives at http://search.adsm.org before posting
questions.
Summary results, particular in the TSM server version 4 range, are
notoriously unreliable.
--
Mark Stapleton (mark.stapleton AT berbee DOT com)
Berbee Information Networks
Office 262.521.5627
|
|
|