On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 11:25:19AM -0500, "Coats, Jack" <Jack.Coats AT 
BANKSTERLING DOT COM> wrote:
> Question: If you defined the remote computer (client with tape drive) as a
> server, 
>   couldn't you use it as part of a 'remote storage pool'?
probably yes, i will try it today and report if it is successfull..
>   Under the new licensing scenario, would it cost more for the client with a
> tape drive over being just a 
>   regular client computer?
our salesman told me that is not important whether it is a server or a
client.. only the CPU number affects the price
but he could be wrong
> 
> Just trying to learn. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:Wanda.Prather AT JHUAPL DOT EDU]
> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 11:15 AM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: using a tape drive attached to remote computer
> 
> 
> No, sorry.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julius Loman [mailto:lomo AT KYBERIA DOT NET] 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 2:57 PM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: using a tape drive attached to remote computer
> 
> 
> hi
> 
> i'd like to ask if it is possible to use a tape drive attached to a
> remote computer, that is also a tsm client. Client platform is Solaris,
> TSM Server is Linux, TSM version 5.2
> 
> regards
> 
> -- 
> 
> [ Julius Loman ][ lomo AT kyberia DOT net ][ http://lomo.kyberia.net ][
> icq:35732873 ]
> 
> Sakra! Tygr mě shodil do tygří pasti! Nepředvídaný nezdar!

-- 

[ Julius Loman ][ lomo AT kyberia DOT net ][ http://lomo.kyberia.net ][ 
icq:35732873 ]

 Despite the cost of living, have you noticed how popular it remains? 

pgpFJcUTjnWpR.pgp
Description: PGP signature