ADSM-L

Re: Lotus Notes Non-TDP backups

2003-07-29 03:44:09
Subject: Re: Lotus Notes Non-TDP backups
From: John Naylor <john.naylor AT SCOTTISH-SOUTHERN.CO DOT UK>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 08:43:28 +0100
Dynamic management class will stop the retries.
Y ou are probably getting the retries because your users are not logging off
their notes
accounts, and the backups should be ok for restore in that case. But with all
potential
"fuzzy backups" scenarios which is the risk with dynamic, you really need to
umderstand your data and to test that the restores are usable.
John






Gordon Woodward <gordon.woodward AT db DOT com> on 07/29/2003 03:00:33 AM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <adsm-l AT vm.marist DOT edu>

To:   adsm-l AT vm.marist DOT edu
cc:    (bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE)
Subject:  Lotus Notes Non-TDP backups



We currently have over 160Gb of Notes mail databases that need to be backed up
nightly. Due to incompatabilities with the Notes TDP, our version of TSM
(v4.2.2.5) and the way compaction runs on our Notes servers, we have to use the
normal Tivoli backup client to backup the mailboxes. It takes about 12 hours for
all the databases to get backed up each night but the vast amount of this time
seems to be spend trying and then retrying to send mailboxes to the TSM server.
A typical schedule log looks like this:

28-07-2003 19:51:53 Retry # 2  Normal File-->       157,548,544
\\sdbo5211\d$\notes\data\mail\beggsa.nsf [Sent]
28-07-2003 19:52:28 Normal File-->        70,778,880
\\sdbo5211\d$\notes\data\mail\bingleyj.nsf [Sent]
28-07-2003 19:54:05 Retry # 1  Normal File-->       349,437,952
\\sdbo5211\d$\notes\data\mail\bignasck.nsf [Sent]
28-07-2003 19:55:10 Normal File-->       131,072,000
\\sdbo5211\d$\notes\data\mail\Bishnic.nsf  Changed
28-07-2003 19:56:58 Normal File-->       265,289,728
\\sdbo5211\d$\notes\data\mail\bellm.nsf [Sent]
28-07-2003 19:58:08 Retry # 1  Normal File-->       131,072,000
\\sdbo5211\d$\notes\data\mail\Bishnic.nsf [Sent]
28-07-2003 20:00:46 Normal File-->       387,186,688
\\sdbo5211\d$\notes\data\mail\BLACKAD.NSF  Changed
28-07-2003 20:03:52 Normal File-->       367,263,744
\\sdbo5211\d$\notes\data\mail\BERNECKC.NSF  Changed
28-07-2003 20:06:18 Retry # 1  Normal File-->       387,186,688
\\sdbo5211\d$\notes\data\mail\BLACKAD.NSF [Sent]
28-07-2003 20:10:11 Normal File-->     1,011,613,696
\\sdbo5211\d$\notes\data\mail\binneyk.nsf  Changed
28-07-2003 20:11:52 Retry # 2  Normal File-->       953,942,016
\\sdbo5211\d$\notes\data\mail\andrewsj.nsf [Sent]
28-07-2003 20:12:01 Retry # 1  Normal File-->       367,263,744
\\sdbo5211\d$\notes\data\mail\BERNECKC.NSF [Sent]
28-07-2003 20:12:05 Normal File-->        10,485,760
\\sdbo5211\d$\notes\data\mail\bousran.nsf [Sent]
28-07-2003 20:13:40 Normal File-->       720,633,856
\\sdbo5211\d$\notes\data\mail\BLACKC.NSF  Changed
28-07-2003 20:18:58 Retry # 3  Normal File-->     1,863,057,408
\\sdbo5211\d$\notes\data\dbecna.nsf  Changed

Is there anything we can do reduce the window for this backup? Both the TSM
server and our Notes server have dedicated 1Gb links so bandwidth isn't a
problem. The Backup Copy Group for the Management Class the Notes data is
allocated to has Copy Serialization set to 'Shared Static'. Would changing this
to Dynamic be beneficial in reducing the amount of retries that occur and also
setting CHANGERETRIES to a lower option help?

Thanks in advance,

Gordon Woodward
Senior Support Analyst
Deutsche Asset Management (Australia) Limited


--

This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are
not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify
the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying,
disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.







**********************************************************************
The information in this E-Mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It may not represent the views of Scottish and Southern
Energy plc.
It is intended solely for the addressees. Access to this E-Mail by
anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient,
any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted
to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any unauthorised recipient should advise the sender immediately of
the error in transmission.

Scottish Hydro-Electric, Southern Electric, SWALEC and S+S
are trading names of the Scottish and Southern Energy Group.
**********************************************************************

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>