ADSM-L

Re: collocated storage pool issue

2003-07-16 10:50:09
Subject: Re: collocated storage pool issue
From: "Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM" <Eric-van.Loon AT KLM DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 16:48:58 +0200
Hi Remco!
Actually, an empty volume becomes scratch as soon as the Delay Period For
Volume Reuse (part of the storage pool definition) is reached...
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines


-----Original Message-----
From: Remco Post [mailto:r.post AT SARA DOT NL]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 16:19
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: collocated storage pool issue


On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:50:08 +0200
Jacques Butcher <butcherjw AT ANANZI.CO DOT ZA> wrote:

> I also had an issue with collocation before where the tape
> volumes do not go back to scratch after reclaimation ran.
>  By querying the library volumes it does not say that these
> tapes contains "data" but they are still private.  Querying
> the volumes shows that the tapes are empty.  They are
> however not automatically deleted from the pool they belong
> to.  Did anyone else get this?
>

Empty volumes do not go to scratch immedeately, this only happens when a
storagepool request a scratch-volume....


> On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:05:24 +0400
>  Zosimo Noriega <znoriega AT ADNOC DOT COM> wrote:
> > Increase the value of Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed in
> > new storage pool.
> > You can reorganize client data into new collacted storage
> > pool by moving
> > node data.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Zosi Noriega
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Abdulaziz Almuammar [mailto:amuammar AT KFSHRC.EDU DOT SA]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:30 PM
> > To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> > Subject: collocated storage pool issue
> >
> > Hi guys,
> > I have uncollocated storage pool that stores all the
> > client data in 3494
> > tape library and I created a new collocated storage pool
> > and redirected all
> > new client data to be stored on it.
> > Each tape in the collocated storage pool is supposed to
> > have one node data
> > (if the pool has empty tapes as I know) but what I foud
> > in the new storage
> > pool is different
> > I found that "some" of the nodes data are stored in one
> > tape.
> > Could any one tell me if this is normal? and if it is not
> > how can I force
> > each tape to have one client data?
> >
> > I have TSM 5.1.5 on AIX 4.3.3
> >
> > Regards,
> > Abdulaziz
>
> Jacques Butcher
> TCM (Technology Corporate Management) Software Engineer
> Cell:  +27 (0)84 676 0329
> Tell:  +27 (0)11 483-2000
> Fax:   +27 (0)11 728-3656
> Nat. IT Diploma, MCSE, IBM Tivoli Storage Manager 5.1
> Certified, NetVault Certified, IPSTor Certified,
> IBM Certified Specialist - Enterprise Tape Solutions
> Version 2
>
> ==
> Download ringtones, logos and picture messages at Ananzi Mobile Fun.
> http://www.ananzi.co.za/cgi-bin/goto.pl?mobile


--
Met vriendelijke groeten,

Remco Post

SARA - Stichting Academisch Rekencentrum Amsterdam    http://www.sara.nl
High Performance Computing  Tel. +31 20 592 8008    Fax. +31 20 668 3167

"I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the computer
industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the computer industry
didn't even foresee that the century was going to end." -- Douglas Adams


**********************************************************************
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), 
its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or 
incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for 
any delay in receipt.
**********************************************************************

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>