ADSM-L

Re: TSMManager vs. TSM Operational Reporting

2003-06-30 11:15:46
Subject: Re: TSMManager vs. TSM Operational Reporting
From: Karel Bos <Karel.Bos AT NUON DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 17:15:19 +0200
You know me, always looking into the 20 or so %.....

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Peter Pijpelink - P.L.C.S. BV Storage Consultants
> [mailto:tsm AT PLCS DOT NL]
> Verzonden: maandag 30 juni 2003 17:13
> Aan: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Onderwerp: Re: TSMManager vs. TSM Operational Reporting
>
>
> At least TSM Operational reporting will be free of charge
> they told me. And
> it works good enough for 80% of customers requests what they
> would like to see.
>
> If anyone like to see output let me know, we have a test running.
>
> Peter
>
>
> At 17:07 30-6-2003 +0200, you wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Using TSMManager and saw some output from TSM Operational
> Reporting. Not too
> >sure if TSM Operational Reporting will replace TSMManager.
> Have to do some
> >testing when it is released.
> >
> >Regard,
> >
> >Karel
> >
> > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > > Van: Gray, Alastair [mailto:Alastair.Gray AT EU.ALTRIA DOT COM]
> > > Verzonden: maandag 30 juni 2003 16:48
> > > Aan: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> > > Onderwerp: TSMManager vs. TSM Operational Reporting
> > >
> > >
> > > Has anyone out there done a comparison of TSMManager against
> > > TSM Operational
> > > Reporting (still in Beta), from which they might be willing
> > > to share some of
> > > the results?
> > >
> > > Question prompted by short time scales and a steep learning curve.
> > >
> > > Alastair Gray
> > > Systems Type
> > >
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>