ADSM-L

Re: 3584 Library sharing problems.

2003-05-27 23:35:03
Subject: Re: 3584 Library sharing problems.
From: Robert Clark <res03db2 AT GTE DOT NET>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 20:22:50 -0700
FWIW:

Talking with the TSM specialist we work with led me to think
that the level of coordination you're looking for is a feature of the
newer level of TSM. (aka 5.X)

We ran into a similar issue with our LanFree tests. (not a problem for
us though, just part of the learning process.)

[RC]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Anthonijsz, Marcel M SITI-ITDGE13" <Marcel.Anthonijsz AT SHELL DOT COM>
To: <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 3:05 AM
Subject: 3584 Library sharing problems.


To all,

I've a bit of a challenge.

We're running TSM 5.1.6.3 on two AIX systems sharing a 3584 Tape library
system.
One AIX server acts as library manager with the library definitions and
paths and drives.
The AIX server acting as client only has the 'shared library' definition and
one tape path relating it to the Library manager.
So far no problems all seems to work fine.
Now I want to add another TSM server to this running on AIX, same level also
4.3.3, but running TSM 4.2.1.15.

So this is what I did:
On library manager      - defined the TSM server running 4.2.1.15
                        - defined tape path(s) to new server, only those
'known' to the new client due to the zoning of the switch to which the
client is connected

On library client               - defined shared library
                        - defined shared drives
                        - defined new device class for the new to use
library

Here comes the real problem; when I start a process on the client which
requests a tape, the client starts a session with the Library manager and
the manager starts the mount of a scratch tapes and then informs the client
via another session about which volume is mounted and on what drive.
Then until now I've got a 100 % score on mismatching, for the manager loads
the tapes on drives NOT known by the client, what is exactly what the client
shows in the actlog and the process gets cancelled.

What I don't understand is WHY does the manager NOT load the scratch tape on
a drive related to the tape paths defined for this client, it just seems to
pick any available drive and informs the client.
What's the use then of defining the paths if they're not taken into account
during the mount?


Marcel Anthonijsz
Central Data Storage Manager (a.k.a. storman)
Shell Information Technology International B.V.
PO Box 1027, 2260 BA  Leidschendam, The Netherlands

Tel: +31-70 303 4984
Mob: +31-6 24 23 6522

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>