ADSM-L

Re: Image backup question: < repost

2003-05-14 16:12:23
Subject: Re: Image backup question: < repost
From: Ken Sedlacek <Ken_Sedlacek AT KYRUS DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 16:12:20 -0400
Thanks Tim, you are right.

Image backup on W2000 only!

Talk about being in the forest and not seeing the trees!


Ken Sedlacek
AIX/TSM/UNIX Administrator
ksedlacek AT kyrus DOT com

IBM Certified Specialist: RS/6000 AIX v4.3 Support
IBM Certified Specialist: RS/6000 SP & PSSP 3
Tivoli Certified Consultant - Tivoli Storage Manager v4.1





"Rushforth, Tim" <TRushforth AT WINNIPEG DOT CA>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
05/14/03 10:22 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"

        To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
        cc:
        Subject:        Re: Image backup question: < repost


Image backup requires a Windows 2000 - this will not work on NT4.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Sedlacek [mailto:Ken_Sedlacek AT KYRUS DOT COM]
Sent: May 13, 2003 5:10 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Image backup question: < repost

This is a repost of the same question last week which did not get much
traction.

Enviro:
W2K TSM v5.1.6.3 server
Windows v5.1.5.15 client

The Challenge:
An OLD NT4 client server needs to move its data to a NEW W2K client
server.
Move ~160 GB of data files (NO OS files) needs to be moved.

My suggested answer:
Use image backups of old NT4 client server data files and place them onto
the new W2K client server.


Is this a viable solution for the Challenge?

If so, what are the DO's and DON'Ts of image backups?


If not, what would be a better solution?


I have read the v5.1 Windows Admin guide on Logical Volume backups and
Image Backups.

Comments??


Ken Sedlacek
AIX/TSM/UNIX Administrator
ksedlacek AT kyrus DOT com

IBM Certified Specialist: RS/6000 AIX v4.3 Support
IBM Certified Specialist: RS/6000 SP & PSSP 3
Tivoli Certified Consultant - Tivoli Storage Manager v4.1

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>