both backups go to disk ....

-----Original Message-----
From: Rupp Thomas (Illwerke) [mailto:thomas.rupp AT ILLWERKE DOT AT]
Sent: woensdag 12 maart 2003 18:29
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: AW: fs backup versus database backup


Hi Ruud,

to which storagepools do you move your data (disk, tape)?

Your FS backup gives you the network data transfer rate, whereas the
DB backup gives you a number including network data transfer rate, 
tape mount/unmount times etc.

Do a QUERY NODE nodename F=D and you will see what the session is
waiting for
   Pct. Idle Wait Last Session: 3.33
  Pct. Comm. Wait Last Session: 0.00
  Pct. Media Wait Last Session: 0.00

Kind regards
Thomas Rupp
Vorarlberger Illwerke AG

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Van Ruler, Ruud R SITI-ITDGE41 [mailto:ruud.vanruler AT SHELL DOT COM] 
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. März 2003 18:16
An: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Betreff: fs backup versus database backup


Hi

FS backup:
 Network data transfer rate:        56,265.13 KB/sec i.e. 56Mb/sec
starttime 02:30 endtime 02:55
ANE4961I (Session: 4073, Node: RYSAP380)  Total number of
                       bytes transferred:   396.77 MB


Database backup:
BKI1215I: Average transmission rate was 97.247 GB/h (27.661 MB/sec).
starttime 20:00  endtime 23:40
BR061I 471 files found for backup, total size 360069.555 MB

Both backups go over Gb links
Why FS backup faster than DB backup , i would expect the other way around ??


Ruud van Ruler, Shell Information Technology International B.V.   - DSES-7
SAP R/3 Alliance Technical Support
ITDSES-6 Technical Information and Links page: http://pat0006/shell.htm
Room 1A/G03
Dokter van Zeelandstraat 1, 2285 BD Leidschendam NL
Tel : +31 (0)70 - 3034644, Fax 4011, Mobile +31 (0)6-55127646

Email Internet: ruud.vanruler AT shell DOT com
                        rvanruler AT hotmail DOT com