ADSM-L

Re: Migration vs. Expiration

2003-03-11 11:23:14
Subject: Re: Migration vs. Expiration
From: Doug Thorneycroft <dthorneycroft AT LACSD DOT ORG>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 08:22:06 -0800
There might be contention if a file is being migrated at the same time it
is being expired.

-----Original Message-----
From:   Rob Hefty [SMTP:R.Hefty AT LABSAFETY DOT COM]
Sent:   Tuesday, March 11, 2003 6:04 AM
To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject:        Migration vs. Expiration

Hello All,

Is there any reason that any one can think of that one shouldn't run
expiration along with migration?  Currently we have all of our maintenance
jobs single thread through a third party scheduler and I was looking to cut
down on time.  Our expiration process takes about 3 hours and migration
takes around 1 hour.

Thanks,
Rob

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>