Re: progressive backup vs. full + incremental
2003-03-05 09:49:44
Progressive incremental backs up only new or changed files. during the
initial backup the client backs up all eligible files of course(full
backup). Subsequently, files are backed up again only if they are new or
have changed since the last backup. In TSMs case, a pointer to each version
of every file for every client is kept in the database , so there is no
need for another full backup.
When you need to restore, you can choose the specific version of the file
or point-in-time to restore, and TSM will restore only that particular
file or files. The approach used for full + incremental backups (NetBackup)
requires an initial full backup, followed by regular incremental or
differential backups (usually once a day), with the complete cycle needing
a full backup to be repeated on a regular (usually weekly) basis. This
backup method results in redundant weekly full backups of files that have
not changed, wasting both network and media resources. The multi-step
restore process in this approach requires the software to restore the last
full backup, then to restore incremental or differential backups on top
of that in order to recover the latest version of a file or an entire
system. This methodology not only involves restoring more data, it also
means more tape mounts and tape positioning and consumes more network
bandwidth all of which amounts to having longer restore times.
Cordiali saluti
Gianluca Mariani
Tivoli TSM Global Response Team, Roma
Via Sciangai 53, Roma
phones : +39(0)659664598
+393351270554 (mobile)
gianluca_mariani AT it.ibm DOT com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy says of the Sirius Cybernetics
Corporation product that "it is very easy to be blinded to the essential
uselessness of them by the sense of achievement you get from getting them
to work at all. In other words ? and this is the rock solid principle on
which the whole of the Corporation's Galaxy-wide success is founded
-their fundamental design flaws are completely hidden by their
superficial design flaws"...
Joni Moyer
<joni.moyer@HIG
HMARK.COM> To
Sent by: "ADSM: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Dist Stor cc
Manager"
<ADSM-L AT VM DOT MARI
bcc
ST.EDU>
Subject
progressive backup vs. full +
05/03/2003 incremental
15.21
Please respond
to "ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
Hello everyone!
I was wondering why the full + incremental would result in a longer restore
time than the progressive backup methodology? From several co-workers
point of view they thought that it would be quicker on the full +
incremental because you wouldn't have to go back to the beginning backups
of the file and restore all of the incrementals, you would just go back to
the most recent full backup and apply the incrementals after that point.
When I went to explain the reasoning behind this, I had some problems
understanding the concept myself, so I was hoping someone could explain
both methods and why they differ in restore time and why progressive is
better than the full + incremental. Thank you so much for any help you can
lend on this matter!
Joni Moyer
Systems Programmer
joni.moyer AT highmark DOT com
(717)975-8338
|
|
|