ADSM-L

Re: Quick expiration question

2003-01-17 09:56:07
Subject: Re: Quick expiration question
From: "Adams, Matt (US - Hermitage)" <maadams AT DELOITTE DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 08:52:59 -0600
So is there no way to keep a nodes data (both active and inactive) from
expiring??



-----Original Message-----
From: Seay, Paul [mailto:seay_pd AT NAPTHEON DOT COM]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 5:29 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: Quick expiration question


Files that do not have an active version do not get rebound if you set them
to a new policy domain management class.  In fact, we have had to create
dummy files and run a backup with a special management class to get this
kind of data to rebind.

I really want a command that I can say rebind to a management class anything
with a specific mask  and date and lock the rebound entries from a client
rebind so that specific backup objects can be managed when business
exceptions come up after the fact.  The traditional full/incremental backup,
you would just change the retention of the tapes.  With what I am suggesting
you get exactly what you want, only the items changed and controlled under
adminstrator management.  Level of authority would be Policy Domain.

Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon Inc.
757-688-8180


-----Original Message-----
From: Adams, Matt (US - Hermitage) [mailto:maadams AT DELOITTE DOT COM]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:38 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: Quick expiration question


In light of this, what would be the best way to protect a node's data from
expiring at all??  To keep from both active and inactive versions expiring??
If we rename the node and filespace, would the time based retention rules
eventually get the data?? Or since the new (renamed) node name never has a
backup, we are ok.  Perhaps moving the node to a policy domain with
unlimited retention is the only way to protect both active and inactive
files??


Just trying to understand this more....


Regards,

Matt Adams
Tivoli Storage Manager Team
Hermitage Site Tech
Deloitte and Touche USA LLP



-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Sims [mailto:rbs AT bu DOT edu]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 6:26 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: Quick expiration question


>Just a quickie. When an inremental backup runs, some files get expired.
>Does this mean that they are 'marked' for expiration, but only get
>deleted from the database when the Expire Inventory job is run?

File expiration candidates processing based upon versions (number of same
file) is performed during client Backups (in contrast to time-based
retention rules, which are processed during a later, separate Expiration).

  Richard Sims, BU
- This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.  -
If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and
are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
- This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.  -
If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and
are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>