ADSM-L

Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?

2002-09-25 10:55:08
Subject: Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?
From: "Rushforth, Tim" <TRushfor AT CITY.WINNIPEG.MB DOT CA>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 09:47:59 -0500
My XP reports 5.01

-----Original Message-----
From: Jolliff, Dale [mailto:xjolliff AT TI DOT COM]
Sent: September 25, 2002 7:43 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?

I believe XP reports NT 5.1


-----Original Message-----
From: David Longo [mailto:David.Longo AT HEALTH-FIRST DOT ORG]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 8:09 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?


W2K is known as NT 5.0 to TSM.  Do a "q node blah f=d"
for your client node on TSM server and see what it comes up
as.  Haven't  had any XP clients yet to see what it is known as.

David Longo

>>> spr AT REXX.ACSU.BUFFALO DOT EDU 09/24/02 08:21PM >>>
> Hi Fred,
>
> I just took a v4.2.2.12 AIX server to v5.1.1.6 last Saturday.
> All I can say is 'not pretty'. This is due to the SYSTEM OBJECT
> problem. If you don't know what this is, you will soon if you
> have WinXP and Win2K clients backing up to v4 and pre v5.1.1.6
> servers.

Does this problem only occur with WinXP and Win2K clients?  What about
Win9x and WinNT?

Either I don't have any Win2K/WinXP clients, or TSM does not set the
platform to Win2k/WinXP?  Are these OS's also known by some version
number
of NT?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>