Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?
2002-09-25 10:55:08
My XP reports 5.01
-----Original Message-----
From: Jolliff, Dale [mailto:xjolliff AT TI DOT COM]
Sent: September 25, 2002 7:43 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?
I believe XP reports NT 5.1
-----Original Message-----
From: David Longo [mailto:David.Longo AT HEALTH-FIRST DOT ORG]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 8:09 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?
W2K is known as NT 5.0 to TSM. Do a "q node blah f=d"
for your client node on TSM server and see what it comes up
as. Haven't had any XP clients yet to see what it is known as.
David Longo
>>> spr AT REXX.ACSU.BUFFALO DOT EDU 09/24/02 08:21PM >>>
> Hi Fred,
>
> I just took a v4.2.2.12 AIX server to v5.1.1.6 last Saturday.
> All I can say is 'not pretty'. This is due to the SYSTEM OBJECT
> problem. If you don't know what this is, you will soon if you
> have WinXP and Win2K clients backing up to v4 and pre v5.1.1.6
> servers.
Does this problem only occur with WinXP and Win2K clients? What about
Win9x and WinNT?
Either I don't have any Win2K/WinXP clients, or TSM does not set the
platform to Win2k/WinXP? Are these OS's also known by some version
number
of NT?
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, (continued)
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, Ted Byrne
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, Gretchen L. Thiele
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, Doug Thorneycroft
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, David Longo
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, Gretchen L. Thiele
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, Magura, Curtis
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, Jolliff, Dale
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?,
Rushforth, Tim <=
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, Andrew Raibeck
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, Todd Lundstedt
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, Gill, Geoffrey L.
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,GL-CSC
|
|
|