Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?
2002-09-24 17:38:14
<SNIP>
It's a risk, because our bare metal restore procedures depend
on a current SYSTEM OBJECT backup, but I can't let the database
swell to infinite proportions - the performance is horrible.
Luckily, the problem is fixed in v5.1.1.6.
Gretchen Thiele
Princeton University
You can always rename the filespace and allow a backup or two to
complete before deleting the old filespace.(At least on the NT platform)
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, (continued)
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, Gretchen L. Thiele
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, Gretchen L. Thiele
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, Ted Byrne
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, Gretchen L. Thiele
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?,
Doug Thorneycroft <=
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, David Longo
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, Gretchen L. Thiele
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, Magura, Curtis
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, Jolliff, Dale
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, Rushforth, Tim
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, Andrew Raibeck
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, Todd Lundstedt
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, Gill, Geoffrey L.
- Re: Anyone tried 5.1.1.6?, Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,GL-CSC
|
|
|