Re: Win2K domino 4.6 server slooooooowwwwww b/u





Zig-

this is Win2k on an ethernet network-- the switch isn't an SP switch.  But
this are the settings in the dsm.opt file right now.

I have played with resourceutilization, compression, and largecommbuffer.
None make any difference.  The one thing that really gets me is that even
with verbose on, I see NO files passed to the server since I kicked off
this trace at 10:51.  This is going to a disk pool that is on a Shark, with
nolimit on the file size.


TXNBytelimit            25600
TCPBuffsize       32
TCPWindowsize           63
TCPNodelay        YES
LARGECOMmbuffer         no
COMPression       No
*quiet
commrestartduration     30
commrestartinterval     20
RESOURceutilization     3




                      Zig Zag
                      <veritrash@YAHOO.        To:       ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST 
DOT EDU
                      COM>                     cc:
                      Sent by: "ADSM:          Subject:  Re: Win2K domino 4.6 
server slooooooowwwwww b/u
                      Dist Stor
                      Manager" <ADSM-
                      L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>


                      08/21/2002 11:14
                      AM
                      Please respond to
                      "ADSM: Dist Stor
                      Manager"






Lisa,

Check you client dsm.sys file(Notes client) see what
the
TCPWINDOWSIZE          1024
TCPBUFFSIZE            128
TXNBYTELIMIT           25600
TCPNODELAY             YES
LARGECOMMBUFFERS       YES

I get decent thruput with this, I am also on SP using
the switch..

--- Lisa Cabanas <CABANL AT MODOT DOT NET> wrote:
> This machine's weekly b/a incr is deathly slow.  The
> nic is set at 100/full
> and the Telcom guru has looked at the swtich, and
> there is nothing amiss
> there.
>
> But it takes forever... The incr kicked off Saturday
> morning, and was still
> going today, with lots of
> 08/17/2002 11:56:10AM ANS1809E Session is lost;
> initializing session reopen
> procedure.
> 08/17/2002 11:56:30AM ... successful
> 08/17/2002 03:36:37PM ANS1809E Session is lost;
> initializing session reopen
> procedure.
> 08/17/2002 03:36:57PM ... successful
> 08/17/2002 05:16:19PM ANS1809E Session is lost;
> initializing session reopen
> procedure.
> 08/17/2002 05:16:39PM ... successful
> 08/17/2002 07:10:09PM ANS1809E Session is lost;
> initializing session reopen
> procedure.
> 08/17/2002 07:10:29PM ... successful
> 08/17/2002 07:38:21PM ANS1809E Session is lost;
> initializing session reopen
> procedure.
> 08/17/2002 07:38:41PM ... successful
>
>
>
> I killed it off, and turned on some traces and see a
> bunch (1.022 x 10^26)
> of these in the trace out.  This seem like a bad
> thing to me.  Is this a
> TSM problem, or do I gather more info and tell the
> server/domino gurus to
> fix something?  (Andy, which trace flags will get me
> the most bang for my
> buck?)
>
>
> dsmem.cpp           (1900):   (Bad free list links)
>
>
> tia
>
> lisa


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs
http://www.hotjobs.com