ADSM-L

Re: Extend Archive retention period

2002-08-07 09:12:09
Subject: Re: Extend Archive retention period
From: "Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM" <Eric-van.Loon AT KLM DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 12:51:32 +0200
Hi Reinhard!
As a matter of fact: NO!
Backups are rebound to the new backup copygroup/managementclass (and thus
retention) archives will NOT be rebound. So updating an archive copygroup
will NOT work for already existing archives.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines


-----Original Message-----
From: Reinhard Mersch [mailto:mersch AT UNI-MUENSTER DOT DE]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 09:12
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: Extend Archive retention period


For a definite answer, you will need a developer, but to the best of
my knowledge, an object's DB entry does not contain the object's
expiration date. It contains the management class ID it is associated to,
and during inventory expiration the decision is based on the archive file's
creation date and the current management class settings. So, yes: changing
the management class / copy group parameters applies to all existing archive
files belonging to that management class (same for backups). This applies
to all *SM versions.

You can easily test it: the command line client shows the expiration date
of archive files. So issue a "query archive", change the management class,
and issue a "query archive" again. The expiration date should have
changed.

Don't forget to activate the policy set.

"Lai, Kathy KL" <Kathy.KL.Lai AT PCCW DOT COM> schrieb:
> Dear all,

> I am using ADSM v3.1.2.57 for backup. I am now have a questiong about
> whether I can extend the retention period of an archived file. I have
create
> a archive type copy group and a management class with certain retention
> period which is not the default management class (say 7days). Then I use
> this management class and copy group to archive a file. My question is
> whether I can change the retention of that file already archived by
changing
> the retention period of the management class? By change the retention
period
> of the management class, will it effective to both file already archived
and
> new archive file after the change or just effective to file archive after
> the change? If I can change the retention period of an archived file by
> change the retver of the management class, does it mean that I have to
> retrieve the file and then re-archive it for a longer retention?

> Please urgently reply me the question as I am using this method to backup
> the DB archive. User now request to hold a certain online backup image of
a
> DB. Now I can only hold the expiration job for the backup image only but
not
> the DB archive. Thank you very much.


> > Regards,
> > Kathy Lai
> >

--
Reinhard Mersch                        Westfaelische Wilhelms-Universitaet
Zentrum fuer Informationsverarbeitung - ehemals Universitaetsrechenzentrum
Roentgenstrasse 9-13, D-48149 Muenster, Germany      Tel: +49(251)83-31583
E-Mail: mersch AT uni-muenster DOT de                       Fax: 
+49(251)83-31653


**********************************************************************
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), 
its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or 
incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for 
any delay in receipt.
**********************************************************************

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>