ADSM-L

Re: Win2K cluster question

2002-07-03 09:25:36
Subject: Re: Win2K cluster question
From: Gianluca Mariani1 <gianluca_mariani AT IT.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 15:23:48 +0200
John,
I'm not sure I understand your question. are you saying you want one
machine in a cluster to be registered to one policy domain and the other
machine in the cluster to be registered to another policy domain? you would
not be using a cluster this way, what would happen in case of failover? you
would failover to a machine with a different nodename and different policy
domain, so you would, effectively, be working on a stand alone basis.

Cordiali saluti
Gianluca Mariani
Tivoli TSM Global Response Team, Roma
Via Sciangai 53, Roma
 phones : +39(0)659664598
                   +393351270554 (mobile)
gianluca_mariani AT it.ibm DOT com



                      John Naylor
                      <john.naylor@SCOTTISH-SOUT        To:       ADSM-L AT 
VM.MARIST DOT EDU
                      HERN.CO.UK>                       cc:
                      Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor         Subject:  Win2K cluster 
question
                      Manager"
                      <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>


                      03-07-02 11.27
                      Please respond to "ADSM:
                      Dist Stor Manager"





We are looking at setting up some win2k clustered TSM clients.
Most of them are fairly small but there is one client with 200gb of data to
be
backed up.
I want to point all the small clients to use our standard tapepool, with
the big
one pointing to a different tapepool
So the question is :-
Can you have clients within the same cluster registered to different policy
domains?

Thanks,
John




**********************************************************************
The information in this E-Mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It may not represent the views of Scottish and Southern
Energy plc.
It is intended solely for the addressees. Access to this E-Mail by
anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient,
any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted
to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any unauthorised recipient should advise the sender immediately of
the error in transmission.

Scottish Hydro-Electric, Southern Electric, SWALEC and S+S
are trading names of the Scottish and Southern Energy Group.
**********************************************************************
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>