Re: Slow Reclamation from disk
2002-06-26 17:07:07
Subject: |
Re: Slow Reclamation from disk |
From: |
Etienne Brodeur <ebrodeur AT SERTI DOT COM> |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Jun 2002 17:03:17 -0400 |
I did try it and it does move a lot faster.. So this has nothing to do
with the fact that my diskpool is on a SAN drives right? So keeping data
on diskpool is not a good idea in small installations? I was told by
Tivoli techs to try and keep a couple of days of backups on disk if
possible to speed up restores... Is this not a good idea?
Thanks for the help,
Etienne Brodeur
Bill Boyer <bill.boyer AT VERIZON DOT NET>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
06/26/2002 11:55 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
cc:
Subject: Re: Slow Reclamation from disk
When the primary location of a file is in a primary DISK random access
storage pool, then this is "working as designed." (That's the answer we
got
from Tivoli) In this case the reclamation task processes 1 file at a time
per transaction. When the primary storage pool is a SEQUENTIAL media
(either
tape or FILE) then the files are batched up by the
MOVEBATCHSIZE/MOVESIZETHRESH parameters. Move the files to a SEQENTIAL
primary pool before running reclamation.
Bill Boyer
DSS, INc.
|
|
|