Re: Suggestions on SystemObject mgmt class for W2K
2002-03-21 10:33:57
Subject: |
Re: Suggestions on SystemObject mgmt class for W2K |
From: |
"Seay, Paul" <seay_pd AT NAPTHEON DOT COM> |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 10:29:36 -0500 |
35 days is just going to cost you 17 to 35 GB of storage pool plain and
simple. What you can do is put it in its own management class using what
you have said below and adding a management class to the end of the
include.systemobject statement.
|
|
|