No, this is just copypools, up to two. I agree with you, and we put in
a requirement at Share to do something like this, with one copy going
to primary and one copy to copypool, but this was during migrate. I
won't be able to take advantage of the copypools in the way that it was
added, because of the tape drive per session requirement.
Andy Carlson |\ _,,,---,,_
andyc AT andyc.carenet DOT org ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_
BJC Health System |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-'
St. Louis, Missouri '---''(_/--' `-'\_)
Cat Pics: http://andyc.dyndns.org/animal.html
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, MC Matt Cooper (2838) wrote:
> Can it be used to do both a MIGRATE and a COPY? Ie, as it moves from disk
> to tape, it is also writing to a 2nd tape that is a part of the COPYPOOL
> which will go offsite? That would make it more in line with other
> mainframe copy products. Dual write, one for onsite and one for offsite.
> Matt
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Carlson [mailto:andyc AT ANDYC.CARENET DOT ORG]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 2:07 PM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: TSM 5.1
>
> #2 is not the panacea that it sounds like. The dual writes to the
> copypool's happens during session data transfer to disk pool - thus, you
> must have a tape drive per session doing the dual write.
>
> Andy Carlson |\ _,,,---,,_
> andyc AT andyc.carenet DOT org ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_
> BJC Health System |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-'
> St. Louis, Missouri '---''(_/--' `-'\_)
> Cat Pics: http://andyc.dyndns.org/animal.html
>
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Richard L. Rhodes wrote:
>
> > We had a meeting with IBM last week where they described some of the
> > new features of 5.1 - coming within a few weeks.
> >
> > 1) multi session restore
> > 2) simultaneous writes to copy pools (more than one)
> > 3) a "move nodedata" command
> > 4) lan-free backup/restore (I thought it already had this)
> > 5) hpux lan-free
> >
>
|
