Matt,
No, that isn't what it does, but it would be more useful if it worked that way.
Jim Sporer



At 03:01 PM 3/12/2002 -0500, you wrote:

Can it be used to do both a MIGRATE and a COPY?  Ie, as it moves from disk
to tape, it is also writing to a 2nd tape that is a part of the COPYPOOL
which will go offsite?   That would make it more in line with other
mainframe copy products.  Dual write, one for onsite and one for offsite.
Matt

-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Carlson [mailto:andyc AT ANDYC.CARENET DOT ORG]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 2:07 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: TSM 5.1

#2 is not the panacea that it sounds like.  The dual writes to the
copypool's happens during session data transfer to disk pool - thus, you
must have a tape drive per session doing the dual write.

Andy Carlson                             |\      _,,,---,,_
andyc AT andyc.carenet DOT org            ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_
BJC Health System                       |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'
St. Louis, Missouri                    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_)
Cat Pics: http://andyc.dyndns.org/animal.html

On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Richard L. Rhodes wrote:

> We had a meeting with IBM last week where they described some of the
> new features of 5.1 - coming within a few weeks.
>
> 1)  multi session restore
> 2)  simultaneous writes to copy pools (more than one)
> 3)  a "move nodedata" command
> 4)  lan-free backup/restore (I thought it already had this)
> 5)  hpux lan-free
>