#2 is not the panacea that it sounds like. The dual writes to the
copypool's happens during session data transfer to disk pool - thus, you
must have a tape drive per session doing the dual write.
Andy Carlson |\ _,,,---,,_
andyc AT andyc.carenet DOT org ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_
BJC Health System |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-'
St. Louis, Missouri '---''(_/--' `-'\_)
Cat Pics: http://andyc.dyndns.org/animal.html
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Richard L. Rhodes wrote:
> We had a meeting with IBM last week where they described some of the
> new features of 5.1 - coming within a few weeks.
>
> 1) multi session restore
> 2) simultaneous writes to copy pools (more than one)
> 3) a "move nodedata" command
> 4) lan-free backup/restore (I thought it already had this)
> 5) hpux lan-free
>
|