ADSM-L

Re: LANFREE Backups - Feedback?

2015-10-04 17:10:41
Subject: Re: LANFREE Backups - Feedback?
From: Bill Mansfield [mailto:WMansfield AT SOLUTIONTECHNOLOGY DOT COM]
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
I thought the restriction was that both the Production database server and
Backup server (where the BCVs get mounted) had to be Solaris, but that the
TSM server could be on a third server of any type.



_____________________________
William Mansfield
Senior Consultant
Solution Technology, Inc





Denis L'Huillier <dlhuillier AT PERSHING DOT COM>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> 03/05/2002 
09:29
AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"


        To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
        cc:
        Subject:        Re: LANFREE Backups - Feedback?


Jason,
I completely agree with you.
The majority of our databases are running on Solaris attached to EMC. But, I
think that the percentage of TSM Servers running on Solaris versus running
on AIX is a lot more for AIX.  I would venture to say that AIX is the
preferred operating system for TSM.  This, I feel is the limitation.  Not
the fact that it's Solaris only, but the fact that TSM will not work with
TDP for EMC if TSM is running on AIX.  It has to be running on Solaris.

Regards,

Denis L. L'Huiller
973-360-7739
dlhuillier AT pershing DOT com
Enterprise Storage Forms ->
http://admpwb01/misc/misc/storage_forms_main.html



                    J Bamford
                    <tsmtech@BLUEYON        To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
                    DER.CO.UK>              cc:
                    Sent by: "ADSM:         Subject:     Re: LANFREE
Backups - Feedback?
                    Dist Stor
                    Manager"
                    <[email protected]
                    T.EDU>


                    03/05/2002 10:18
                    AM
                    Please respond
                    to "ADSM: Dist
                    Stor Manager"






Yes I believe when Tivoli looked at the development of the Timefinder
function they looked at the market first.  It was concluded that an EMC/Sun
solution represented the larger market share of what customer have
installed.

ie there are more EMC/Sun installed sites than there are EMC/Aix
sites.Mainly because Aix sites tend to be IBM disk solutions.

Therefore if you wnat to sell a product, develop for the majority first. If
people like it and want it so make some more !  Vendors do make software for
there own products, so hopefully I see you purchasing lots of ESS soon then
!!

There's little point in doing costly developing for a product that no one
wants.  Yes the TDP for EMC has a VERY limited scole for configuration, and
no RS/6000 isn't in there I believe.

Specific products like this tend to be demand driven.  From what I
understand the current TDP/EMC saw a very limited uptake by customers. There
has also been little demand to expand is platform coverage in this space.

The TDP for EMC was also on the market before the TDP for ESS/Flashcopy.
Thinking back I believe that is because EMC had the timefinder on the market
before IBM/ESS and flashcopy.  It was a while after before Tivoli got it's
hands on working Flashcopy to do any sort of development, and these thing
take time.

Back to the original point LAN-Free with TSM works backup and restore apart
from the above, and I'm running a 2 day workshop in the UK next week to show
it working and give hands on to those who want to know more.

Jason

PS.  These are my personal views and not that of IBM or Tivoli Corp.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>