Re: RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS
2015-10-04 17:12:14
It sounds like you must run a Windows based system. What server config are
you running, how many clients and what kind of data transfer rates are you
getting? We are thinking risc because of the stability and increased
throughput over Windows and possible SAN in the next couple of years.
>>> MRemeta AT SELIGMANDATA DOT COM 02/21 3:01 PM >>>
Why a 'RISC based server system' Mark? You could handle that number of
clients easily with a low end Windows server.
Mark
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- Re: RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS, (continued)
- Re: RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS, PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI)
- Re: RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS, Remeta, Mark
- Re: RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS, Remeta, Mark
- RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS, Mark Morrison [mailto:MORRISM1
- Re: RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS, SBCSI
- RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS, Mark Morrison [mailto:MORRISM1
- Re: RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS, ADSM : Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L
- Re: RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS, Andy Carlson [mailto:andyc
- Re: RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS, Andy Carlson [mailto:andyc
- Re: RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS,
Mark Morrison [mailto:MORRISM1 <=
|
|
|