ADSM-L
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: defining lto drive not looking correct

2002-02-07 00:53:21
Subject: Re: defining lto drive not looking correct
From: "Davidson, Becky" <Becky.Davidson AT SLBG DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 14:52:47 -0600 
Yes it is defined
devc = ltotape
dev acc strategy=sequential
storage pool count = 0
devt=lto
format=drive
mountl=drives
mountw=60
mountr=60
labelprefix=adsm
library=ltolib
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Who else got 'Job Spam'?, Seay, Paul
Next by Date:  Re: No Drives Available errors, Mike Crawford
Previous by Thread:  Re: defining lto drive not looking correct, Bill Mansfield
Next by Thread:  Re: defining lto drive not looking correct, David Longo
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]