Andy - here are some queries to answer your questions.

tsm: NEW_ADSM_SERVER_ON_PORT_1600>q n wfc1450

Node Name                 Platform Policy Domain  Days Since Days Since Locked?
                                   Name           Last Acce-   Password
                                                          ss        Set
------------------------- -------- -------------- ---------- ---------- -------
WFC1450                   WinNT    CSDL_STANDARD1         <1         11   No
WFC1450                   WinNT    CSDL_STANDARD1         <1         11   No

tsm: NEW_ADSM_SERVER_ON_PORT_1600>q sched n=wfc1450

Domain       * Schedule Name    Action Start Date/Time      Duration Period Day
------------ - ---------------- ------ -------------------- -------- ------ ---
CSDL_STANDA-   EVENING          Inc Bk 05/18/1998 18:30:00      6 H    1 D  Any
CSDL_STANDA-   EVENING          Inc Bk 05/18/1998 18:30:00      6 H    1 D  Any
 RD1

tsm: NEW_ADSM_SERVER_ON_PORT_1600>q sched csdl_standard1 evening f=d

            Policy Domain Name: CSDL_STANDARD1
                 Schedule Name: EVENING
                   Description:
                        Action: Incremental
                       Options:
                       Objects:
                      Priority: 5
               Start Date/Time: 05/18/1998 18:30:00
                      Duration: 6 Hour(s)
                        Period: 1 Day(s)
                   Day of Week: Any
                    Expiration:
Last Update by (administrator): WFC1450
         Last Update Date/Time: 05/04/1999 13:50:43
              Managing profile:

So the schedule doesn't include any special objects.

I am assuming that this is something to do with the journal.  I expect
things in c:\mail could change while the backup was going on, and the journal 
process
sent in some late requests.  I know you are going to say 'no way' so maybe this 
is
a new bug.

Bill

At 11:57 AM 1/29/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>Very odd. What does the schedule definition look like? The "successful
>incremental backup messages" would suggest that the schedule includes file
>specs for the following:
>
>   c:
>   c:\Program Files\SQLLIB\java\java12\jdk\bin\_fty0.231\*
>   c:\mail\LISTS.fol\descmap.pce\*
>   c:\mail\descmap.pce\*
>
>Is there anything a the top of dsmsched.log to suggest that backups for
>multiple file specs are being initiated?
>
>Regards,
>
>Andy
>
>Andy Raibeck
>IBM Software Group
>Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
>Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
>Internet e-mail: storman AT us.ibm DOT com
>
>The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
>The command line is your friend.
>"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
>
>
>
>
>"William F. Colwell" <bcolwell AT DRAPER DOT COM>
>Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
>01/29/2002 09:01
>Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
>
>
>        To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>        cc:
>        Subject:        Odd messages at the end of dsmsched.log
>
>
>
>I just got a new pc last week, it is running winXP.  I have the 4.2.1.20
>client with journalling and subfile backups enabled.  I examined the
>dsmsched.log and found these odd messages at the end.  My question is why
>after the message 'successful incremental backup of \\wfc1450\c$'  are
>there more expiring and backup messages?
>
>01/28/2002 18:47:05 Directory-->                   0 \\wfc1450\c$\program
>files\Tivoli\TSM\baclient [Sent]
>01/28/2002 18:47:05 Normal File-->                22 \\wfc1450\c$\s3n4
>[Sent]
>01/28/2002 18:47:06 Successful incremental backup of '\\wfc1450\c$'
>
>01/28/2002 18:47:19 Expiring-->                    0 \\wfc1450\c$\Program
>Files\SQLLIB\java\java12\jdk\bin\_fty0.231 [Sent]
>01/28/2002 18:47:19 Successful incremental backup of '\\wfc1450\c$\Program
>Files\SQLLIB\java\java12\jdk\bin\_fty0.231\*'
>
>01/28/2002 18:47:19 Expiring-->                    0
>\\wfc1450\c$\mail\LISTS.fol\descmap.pce [Sent]
>01/28/2002 18:47:19 Successful incremental backup of
>'\\wfc1450\c$\mail\LISTS.fol\descmap.pce\*'
>
>01/28/2002 18:47:20 Expiring-->                    0
>\\wfc1450\c$\mail\descmap.pce [Sent]
>01/28/2002 18:47:20 Successful incremental backup of
>'\\wfc1450\c$\mail\descmap.pce\*'
>
>01/28/2002 18:47:35 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS BEGIN
>01/28/2002 18:47:35 Total number of objects inspected:   15,691
>01/28/2002 18:47:35 Total number of objects backed up:   15,613
>01/28/2002 18:47:35 Total number of objects updated:          0
>01/28/2002 18:47:35 Total number of objects rebound:          0
>01/28/2002 18:47:35 Total number of objects deleted:          0
>01/28/2002 18:47:35 Total number of objects expired:      2,221
>01/28/2002 18:47:35 Total number of objects failed:           0
>01/28/2002 18:47:35 Total number of bytes transferred:   250.00 MB
>01/28/2002 18:47:35 Data transfer time:                   17.16 sec
>01/28/2002 18:47:35 Network data transfer rate:        14,915.15 KB/sec
>01/28/2002 18:47:35 Aggregate data transfer rate:        260.93 KB/sec
>01/28/2002 18:47:35 Objects compressed by:                   36%
>01/28/2002 18:47:35 Elapsed processing time:           00:16:21
>01/28/2002 18:47:35 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS END
>01/28/2002 18:47:36 --- SCHEDULEREC OBJECT END EVENING 01/28/2002 18:30:00
>01/28/2002 18:47:36 Scheduled event 'EVENING' completed successfully.
>01/28/2002 18:47:36 Sending results for scheduled event 'EVENING'.
>01/28/2002 18:47:37 Results sent to server for scheduled event 'EVENING'.
>
>----------
>Bill Colwell
>C. S. Draper Lab
>Cambridge Ma.

----------
Bill Colwell
Bill Colwell
C. S. Draper Lab
Cambridge Ma.