Re: What qualifies as an in use license?
2002-01-15 11:56:40
As I understand it, one needs to buy one managed system (LAN or SAN) per
managed SYSTEM, regardless of how many nodes are registered on that system.
The 'q license' report is not necessarily a good indication of how many
client BA licenses you have to buy (it works well for TDPs and libraries).
_____________________________
William Mansfield
Senior Consultant
Solution Technology, Inc
Daniel Sparrman
<daniel.sparrman To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
@EXIST.SE> cc:
Sent by: "ADSM: Subject: Re: What qualifies as
an in use license?
Dist Stor
Manager"
<[email protected]
T.EDU>
01/15/2002 09:44
AM
Please respond
to "ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
Hi
Yes, every node registred on the server counts as one client license.
Also, if you use separate nodenames for Tivoli Data Protection clients,
everyone will count as 1 Managed System LAN.
I'm not sure, but I also think that every Managed System SAN counts as one
managed systems lan also.
Best Regards
Daniel Sparrman
-----------------------------------
Daniel Sparrman
Daniel Sparrman
Exist i Stockholm AB
Bergkällavägen 31D
192 79 SOLLENTUNA
Växel: 08 - 754 98 00
Mobil: 070 - 399 27 51
Dylan Ryback
<dryback@HOME To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
.COM> cc:
Sent by: Subject: What qualifies as an
in use license?
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
<ADSM-L AT VM DOT MA
RIST.EDU>
2002-01-15
16:45
Please
respond to
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
I'm in the midst of doing a cleanup job on our TSM servers. When I do a 'q
license', one of the results is:
Number of Managed System for LAN in use: 107
My question is, what counts as 'in use'? For example, there are a bunch of
nodes that are defined and are no longer used or associated with any
schedules. Do these count as 'in use', and if so, should I export the node
out of the db and delete it to get the license counts down? One other
question: anyone got a query to figure out which nodes are NOT associated
with a schedule. This would help me identify nodes that are candidates for
export.
Many thanks,
Dylan
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- What qualifies as an in use license?, Dylan Ryback
- Re: What qualifies as an in use license?, Daniel Sparrman
- Re: What qualifies as an in use license?, Denis L'Huillier
- Re: What qualifies as an in use license?, Tom Melton
- Re: What qualifies as an in use license?,
Bill Mansfield <=
- Re: What qualifies as an in use license?, Prather, Wanda
- Re: What qualifies as an in use license?, Daniel Sparrman
- Re: What qualifies as an in use license?, Bill Mansfield
- Re: What qualifies as an in use license?, Rushforth, Tim
- Re: What qualifies as an in use license?, Zlatko Krastev/ACIT
- Re: What qualifies as an in use license?, Daniel Sparrman
- Re: What qualifies as an in use license?, Bill Mansfield
- Re: What qualifies as an in use license?, Zlatko Krastev/ACIT
- Re: What qualifies as an in use license?, Bill Mansfield
- Re: What qualifies as an in use license?, Daniel Sparrman
|
|
|