Re: Incremental forever -- any problems?
2001-12-18 10:20:07
Hi Robin,
We use STK 9840 drives in an STK9710 robot (forerunner of the L700, I
think).
Mount time for the 9840 is under 30 seconds; maybe 40 seconds to write for
an append.
Dismount is also very fast because they rewind to the middle of the tape
instead of the beginning, I think.
The faster drives make running collocation quite painless; even if you have
to mount 10 tapes on a restore, that only adds 5 minutes total to the
restore time.
The 9840 is in the same class as the IBM 3590 drive; MUCH faster to mount
and locate than DLT. (and yep, lots more $)
We tried DLT drives in the 9710 first. Worked OK for our low-volume TSM
server; just couldn't take the pounding on our high-volume TSM server. We
especially got hurt by the DLT "false cleans". Too much start/stop/append
activity on the tapes made them subject to I/O errors on readback; each time
you get an I/O error it triggers a false clean; so doing the restore you get
up to 3 minutes to mount, plus another 3-6 minutes to process the cleaning
tape after the tape dismounts! That was a killer.
Your mileage may vary....
************************************************************************
Wanda Prather
The Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Lab
443-778-8769
wanda_prather AT jhuapl DOT edu
"Intelligence has much less practical application than you'd think" -
Scott Adams/Dilbert
************************************************************************
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Incremental forever -- any problems?, Adam J Boyer
- Re: Incremental forever -- any problems?, Tim Melly
- Re: Incremental forever -- any problems?, John Naylor
- Re: Incremental forever -- any problems?, Prather, Wanda
- Re: Incremental forever -- any problems?, Robin Sharpe
- Re: Incremental forever -- any problems?, Brown, Bud
- Re: Incremental forever -- any problems?, Robin Sharpe
- Re: Incremental forever -- any problems?, Jeff Bach
- Re: Incremental forever -- any problems?, prakash mathur
- Re: Incremental forever -- any problems?,
Prather, Wanda <=
- Re: Incremental forever -- any problems?, Prather, Wanda
- Re: Incremental forever -- any problems?, Jim Sporer
- Re: Incremental forever -- any problems?, Jeff Bach
- Re: Incremental forever -- any problems?, Alex Paschal
- Re: Incremental forever -- any problems?, Joe Faracchio
- Re: Incremental forever -- any problems?, MC Matt Cooper (2838)
- Re: Incremental forever -- any problems?, Alex Paschal
|
|
|