ADSM-L

Re: abrupt change in request number format

2001-11-04 14:44:45
Subject: Re: abrupt change in request number format
From: David Longo <David.Longo AT HEALTH-FIRST DOT ORG>
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2001 14:41:31 -0500
The number goes to 999 then  back to 001 - normally.  You don't need leading 
000's for reply.   REQ 001 can be answered with REP 1.

David Longo

>>> Peter.K.Glass AT WELLSFARGO DOT COM 11/04/01 01:05PM >>>
We have a script that automates the operator REPLY command requirement for
tape ejects.

The operator request number that the REPLY is issued against has always been
a 3-digit number, with leading zeros (e.g. reply 001), and our script is
written accordingly. However, a few days ago, the request numbers suddenly
converted to a 1-digit number format, for no apparent reason. This causes
the script to fail.

Anybody know what would cause the format of operator request numbers to
suddenly change from a 3-digit number to a 1-digit number?

How can we change the request number format back to the original 3-digit
format?

We are running TSM V3 R2 L1.2 on Solaris 8.
Thanks, in advance.

Peter Glass
Distributed Storage Management (DSM)
Wells Fargo Services Company
> * 612-667-0086   * 866-407-5362
> * peter.k.glass AT wellsfargo DOT com 
>



"MMS <health-first.org>" made the following
 annotations on 11/04/01 14:50:37
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain This message 
is for the named person's use only.  It may contain confidential, proprietary, 
or legally privileged information.  No confidentiality or privilege is waived 
or lost by any mistransmission.  If you receive this message in error, please 
immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard 
copies of it, and notify the sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, 
use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are 
not the intended recipient.  Health First reserves the right to monitor all 
e-mail communications through its networks.  Any views or opinions expressed in 
this message are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where the 
message states such views or opinions are on behalf of a particular entity;  
and (2) the sender is authorized by the entity to give such views or opinions.

==============================================================================
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>