When I signed onto this list there was a specific statement, which
effectively said, the postings by IBM/Tivoli staff are *NOT* an official
answer from IBM/Tivoli.  So as Zlatko Krastev wrote, they are a more skilled
colleague.

For official answers call the 800 number or search the web.

On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM wrote:

> Hi Zlatko!
> Andrew Raibeck is a person from TSM Development at Tivoli. So his statements
> are in fact Tivoli statements, unless otherwise specified, that is.
> Kindest regards,
> Eric van Loon
> KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zlatko Krastev/ACIT [mailto:acit AT ATTGLOBAL DOT NET]
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 16:29
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: FW: v4.2.1 TSM Clients
>
>
> First of all I do not know Andy's position at Tivoli.
> And read what is written in the README:
> "This is not officially supported by IBM, but IBM support people
> do participate in the discussions, along with other  users."
> So IMHO here Andy is just a colleague. More skilled in ADSM/TSM, closer to
> the developers, but just a colleague.
> If something shows up on the web-site or in docs on media that would be
> official.
>
> Zlatko Krastev
> IT Consultant
>
>
>
>
>
> "Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM" <Eric-van.Loon AT KLM DOT COM> on 19.10.2001 17:57:48
> Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
> To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> cc:
>
> Subject:        Re: FW: v4.2.1 TSM Clients
>
> Andrew Raibeck answered "I am almost certain that this change in behavior
> is
> not deliberate. The APAR is going to be handled as a code defect"
> Isn't that you'r Tivoli official answer?
> Kindest regards,
> Eric van Loon
> KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zlatko Krastev/ACIT [mailto:acit AT ATTGLOBAL DOT NET]
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:29
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: FW: v4.2.1 TSM Clients
>
>
> This was already discussed in the list. Look for the thread "Windows client
> behavior change at 4.2.1.0" and answer of Andrew Raibeck from 9.10.2001.
> But it is possible that Andy and this Bob are just having different
> PERSONAL opinions. We still do not have answer from any Tivoli official, do
> we?
>
> Zlatko Krastev
> IT Consultant
>
>
>
>
>
> "Subash, Chandra" <CSSubash AT TELETECHINTL DOT COM> on 18.10.2001 07:41:31
> Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
> To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> cc:
>
> Subject:        FW: v4.2.1 TSM Clients
>
> i HAVE GOT THIS EMAIL FROM ONE OF MY FRIENDS. GUYS WHAT DO YOU THINK IS IT
> TRUE ?
>
> Hi Guys
>
> According to Tivoli Support they have made an alteration to way client
> v4.2.1 reports Result code 4 to the server. Earlier version clients would
> allow for a certain number of files to fail during the backup and still
> report to the server that the Schedule was successful. However version
> 4.2.1
> has been altered so that a result code of failed will be reported to the
> server even if 1 file fails during a backup.
> ntcmachine had been failing on some WINNT system files which I have added
> exceptions for under direction of Tivoli support and now backups of this
> machine seem to be successful.
> Bob from Tivoli suggested that if we are worried about seeing failed result
> codes on the daily report that there may be a way to generate a report
> listing statistics of how many files or how much data had been backed up
> from each machine to provide a more accurate picture as to whether the
> backups were successful.
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged
> material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you
> are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed,
> copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or
> attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have
> received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by
> return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij
> NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the
> incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor
> responsible for any delay in receipt.
> **********************************************************************
>