ADSM-L
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: 3590E1A vs IBM LTO

2001-10-21 13:04:56
Subject: Re: 3590E1A vs IBM LTO
From: "Seay, Paul" <seay_pd AT NAPTHEON DOT COM>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 13:01:40 -0400 
I agree, but I have not actually benchmarked it, so I did not want to let my
bigotry for the  Magstar technology influence the discussion.  The real
issue is reliability.  I doubt LTO will be as reliable as Magstar for years,
if ever.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: 3590E1A vs IBM LTO, Joshua S. Bassi
Next by Date:  Re: 3590E1A vs IBM LTO, Bill Mansfield
Previous by Thread:  Re: 3590E1A vs IBM LTO, Seay, Paul
Next by Thread:  Re: 3590E1A vs IBM LTO, Bill Mansfield
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]