Yes, I was told the receive side is digital.
Matt

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Robert Clark [mailto:res03db2 AT GTE DOT NET]
Sent:   Thursday, May 31, 2001 12:42 PM
To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject:        Re: ANYONE ELSE TRY USIG SUBFILES?

5K bytes/sec is good for 56k under good circumstances isn't it?

With lossage due to a less than optimal PPP implementation, 2k doesn't
sound all that unusual. (To me anyway.)

Is at least one of the ends a digital connection?

[RC]

On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 12:31:52PM -0400, MC Matt Cooper (2838) wrote:
> Hello All,
>         We are testing out the use of SUBFILE processing.  We have a user
> group that would have to do dial-in backups or we buy them zip drives.
> Using SUBFILE processing, a very narrow include/exclude list, and
> compression we still se backups that are close to 40MB.  We insist that
the
> test group get a connection of at least 40K bits/sec.  I see the backups
> running at less than  2K bytes/sec.  I played with many different parms
and
> can not get things to run any faster.  If this is the best we can do we
will
> be purchasing  a lot of zip drives (400+).  HAS ANYONE ELSE TRIED THIS?
IS
> ANYONE ELSE GETTING BETTER THROUGHPUT ON A 56kbs DIALUP line?
> Thanks
> Matt