ADSM-L

Re: ANYONE ELSE TRY USIG SUBFILES?

2001-05-31 12:39:45
Subject: Re: ANYONE ELSE TRY USIG SUBFILES?
From: Robert Clark <res03db2 AT GTE DOT NET>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 09:42:15 -0700
5K bytes/sec is good for 56k under good circumstances isn't it?

With lossage due to a less than optimal PPP implementation, 2k doesn't
sound all that unusual. (To me anyway.)

Is at least one of the ends a digital connection?

[RC]

On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 12:31:52PM -0400, MC Matt Cooper (2838) wrote:
> Hello All,
>         We are testing out the use of SUBFILE processing.  We have a user
> group that would have to do dial-in backups or we buy them zip drives.
> Using SUBFILE processing, a very narrow include/exclude list, and
> compression we still se backups that are close to 40MB.  We insist that the
> test group get a connection of at least 40K bits/sec.  I see the backups
> running at less than  2K bytes/sec.  I played with many different parms and
> can not get things to run any faster.  If this is the best we can do we will
> be purchasing  a lot of zip drives (400+).  HAS ANYONE ELSE TRIED THIS?  IS
> ANYONE ELSE GETTING BETTER THROUGHPUT ON A 56kbs DIALUP line?
> Thanks
> Matt
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>