ADSM-L

Re: Reboot during NT client upgrade

2001-05-31 11:44:30
Subject: Re: Reboot during NT client upgrade
From: David Longo <David.Longo AT HEALTH-FIRST DOT ORG>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 11:45:08 -0400
I think the best bet is to plan for reboot on ALL these systems.

One of my methods on these systems BTW is to totally delete old version(s) and 
then install new versions, saving dsm.opt of course.  I find that in many cases 
there may be two *SM versions on system and some other misc stuff, so this gets 
me to a "clean" state.


>>> Thomas.Denier AT MAIL.TJU DOT EDU 05/31/01 11:26AM >>>
My site is about to upgrade its Windows NT client systems to 4.1.2.12.
We are starting with the ones that currently have 3.1.0.6 client code,
and will subsequently upgrade the ones with various service levels of
the 3.7 code. We currently have to plan every upgrade to allow for the
possibility of rebooting the client. One of the Windows NT administrators
has observed that life would be a lot easier if we could predict in
advance whether the client upgrade on a specific system would require
a reboot or not. Is there any way to do this?



"MMS <health-first.org>" made the following
 annotations on 05/31/01 11:47:17
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain This message 
is for the named person's use only.  It may contain confidential, proprietary, 
or legally privileged information.  No confidentiality or privilege is waived 
or lost by any mistransmission.  If you receive this message in error, please 
immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard 
copies of it, and notify the sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, 
use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are 
not the intended recipient.  Health First reserves the right to monitor all 
e-mail communications through its networks.  Any views or opinions expressed in 
this message are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where the 
message states such views or opinions are on behalf of a particular entity;  
and (2) the sender is authorized by the entity to give such views or opinions.

==============================================================================
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>