You definitely need enough iron to do this.  It's just a question of
whether to put your servers in 1 big box or two smaller ones.  We haven't
seen memory leak problems lately, so I'm not worried about that.

I agree with Richard Rhodes' comment that we shouldn't have to do this just
to get around limitations of the product, but right now that's the way it is.

At 10:31 AM 5/10/2001 -0500, PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI) wrote:

Hi

But memory utilization , network utilization and CPU utilization and memory
leaks will be high.
Am I right.

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Zarnowski [mailto:vkm AT CORNELLC.CIT.CORNELL DOT EDU]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 10:08 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: Multiple TSM* Servers On Same Machine


The reason I would do it would be to keep the database size down.

At 11:41 AM 5/9/2001 -0400,
Robert_K_Miller/Lancaster/Corporate/Armstrong AT ARMSTRONG DOT COM wrote:
>Why would one put multiple TSM servers on a single machine?