Re: SAP and 3494 performance.
2001-03-21 11:33:39
Bill,
I think this was to adress the single large client scenario, where migprocess=5
would not help
William Boyer <wboyer AT PTD DOT NET> on 03/21/2001 04:25:56 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
cc: (bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE)
Subject: Re: SAP and 3494 performance.
Why not just set the MIGPROCESS=5 when you lower the migration threshold? Do
yo find the MOVE DATA more effecient than the MIGRATION processes?
Bill Boyer
DSS, Inc.
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: SAP and 3494 performance., (continued)
- Re: SAP and 3494 performance., bbullock
- Re: SAP and 3494 performance., Davidson, Becky
- Re: SAP and 3494 performance., Cook, Dwight E
- Re: SAP and 3494 performance., Cook, Dwight E
- FW: SAP and 3494 performance., Norback, Jan
- Re: SAP and 3494 performance., Davidson, Becky
- Re: SAP and 3494 performance., bbullock
- Re: SAP and 3494 performance., Cook, Dwight E
- Re: SAP and 3494 performance.,
John Naylor <=
- Re: SAP and 3494 performance., Davidson, Becky
- Re: SAP and 3494 performance., bbullock
- Re: SAP and 3494 performance., Cook, Dwight E
- Re: SAP and 3494 performance., Nicholas Cassimatis
|
|
|