ADSM-L

Re: NetApp filer backup results

2000-12-29 20:23:56
Subject: Re: NetApp filer backup results
From: Len Boyle <SNOLEN AT VM.SAS DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 19:20:02 EST
In article <862569C4.00736BD9.00 AT hubmail1.aal DOT org>, Bob Barden
<Bob_Barden AT AAL DOT ORG> says:
>
>Hi all,
>
>Currently running TSM 3.7.3 on OS/390 with a TSM client at 3.1.0.7 on NT.
>Client size is 450 mhz / 512mb of memory.
> We are backing up a Network Appliance 730 box.  The volume that we are
>inspecting has had the full backup run, but when we run the incremental we
>receive the following stats:
>
>Objects inspected         3,304,749
>Objects backed up          7,702
>Total bytes transferred  3.47MB
>Elapsed time                    19:42:50
>
>By running a query node on this we see Pct Idle Wait  = 98.82
>
>Any ideas on how to speed this process up would be most appreciated.  Or is
s
>thi
>as good as it gets.....?

Hello Bob

I suspect that the main problem is that you are
backing up a remote file server using protocols that are not optimized
for this type of activity.

You might want to look at the cifs  stats on the netapp box and the
network and fs stats on the nt box. Their may be some way to twist
some knobs to speed things up. But I expect that you might be breaking
new ground here. Maybe the Tivoli and/or netapp support folks could
help with this.

If you are not using nt security for the filesystem then you
might get faster response with a unix client and nfs.

There was some talk that IBM/Tivoli and the netapp folks might do some
work to offer better support for the netapp with the TSM product.
Does anyone have any news on this front?

We have a number of Netapp here, but are using another vendors product,
with the ndmp protocol. This process is much quicker then the TSM
incremental only system, but does use more in the way of media and
drive hardware. I suspect that TSM could handle the ndmp process
with an client written with the TSM api library. But it would have to
be a full/inc backup scheme. But that appears to be what most of the
api clients do.

Or since the netapp is based on the bsd kernel, one would think that
Tivoli could write a client that works on the netapp and does there
classic backups. Of course this would have to be in partnership with
netapp.

Please let us know how you make out with this.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Leonard Boyle                               snolen AT vm.sas DOT com
Leonard Boyle                               snolen AT vm.sas DOT com
SAS Institute Inc.                          ussas4hs@ibmmail
Room RB448                                  len.boyle AT sas DOT com
1 SAS Campus Drive                          (919) 531-6241
Cary NC 27513
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>